Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-n-roll-classic-rock-60s-rock/)
-   -   Led Zeppelin vs. The Beatles (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-n-roll-classic-rock-60s-rock/9-led-zeppelin-vs-beatles.html)

boo boo 06-15-2006 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger
If it was around the time that they put out Shiny Happy People he had a bloody good point.

Everybody makes mistakes, R.E.M. makes mistakes, Motley Crue are a mistake.

And easy to say that Automatic For The People pwns anything Crue ever did.

Urban Hat€monger ? 06-15-2006 01:22 PM

Automatic For The People is my least favourite REM album up till that point.

bruise_violet 06-15-2006 02:11 PM

I love both, but at the moment I'd listen to more Led Zeppelin. I just love Robert so much!

explosions-in-my-pants 06-15-2006 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bruise_violet
I love both, but at the moment I'd listen to more Led Zeppelin. I just love Robert so much!

thats cause in the 70;s Robert Plant, and Jimmy Page were the sexiest men ever... :love: yum

bungalow 06-15-2006 08:36 PM

I guess if you're into beastial, groupie raping satanists.

sleepy jack 06-15-2006 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bungalowbill357
I guess if you're into beastial, groupie raping satanists.

& pedophiliac.

Laces Out Dan! 06-15-2006 08:37 PM

I Dig

explosions-in-my-pants 06-15-2006 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill
& pedophiliac.

well if there in there early 20's and me being 18-19 years old i don't see that being wrong.. and theres nothing wrong with a little fling...just don't make yourself a slut out of it..

sleepy jack 06-15-2006 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by explosions-in-my-pants
well if there in there early 20's and me being 18-19 years old i don't see that being wrong.. and theres nothing wrong with a little fling...just don't make yourself a slut out of it..

...'Cause im sure plant and page only dated 18-19 year olds, and it was just a fling then..

bungalow 06-15-2006 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by explosions-in-my-pants
well if there in there early 20's and me being 18-19 years old i don't see that being wrong.. and theres nothing wrong with a little fling...just don't make yourself a slut out of it..

Are you a dumbass?
If your 18-19 there is nothing pedophillic about it. Do you know what pedophillic means?

explosions-in-my-pants 06-15-2006 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill
...'Cause im sure plant and page only dated 18-19 year olds, and it was just a fling then..

i'm saying what it would be like for me.. I have a few dvd's about Jimmy Page and only him in the band being in his early 20's going out with a girl that was 13-14 model.. anyways but i'm of age.. and it wouldn't be rape.. and it wouldn't make me a slut.

sleepy jack 06-15-2006 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by explosions-in-my-pants
i'm saying what it would be like for me.. I have a few dvd's about Jimmy Page and only him in the band being in his early 20's going out with a girl that was 13-14 model.. anyways but i'm of age.. and it wouldn't be rape.. and it wouldn't make me a slut.

Where did I say you were, and where did I say it was? I was attacking them not you.

explosions-in-my-pants 06-15-2006 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill
Where did I say you were, and where did I say it was? I was attacking them not you.

I wasn't saying that you said those things, but i was making it clear about what i thought.

bungalow 06-15-2006 09:01 PM

So you're saying you see nothing wrong with beastial, pedophillic, satanists?

Stone Magnet 06-15-2006 09:25 PM

Nothing wrong with pedophilic satanists.

cardboard adolescent 06-16-2006 01:49 AM

See, it's the satanists that aren't animal-fucking pedophiles that you have to watch out for. They're seriously messed up.

Oh, and it was the 70's. Give them a break. They didn't have the internet to keep 'em busy. Sometimes the only thing you can do is **** a preteen and worship Satan.

MURDER JUNKIE 06-16-2006 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cardboard adolescent
Sometimes the only thing you can do is **** a preteen and worship Satan.

I have been saying that for years http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f3...p/badteeth.gif

blackTshirt 06-16-2006 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hiu
I thought this was generally acknowleged that anything anyone posts on a messageboard about a band is opinion and thus it doesn't need to be said. I guess I was wrong.

when you talk about things without saying "in my opinion" it's because it is a general truth.. and saying both bands are overrated is kinda harsh.. so add "in my opinion" and everyone will be happy :)
that was the manners lesson

dojo 06-17-2006 04:25 AM

For me it's a "no contest" situation. The only Beatles song I kinda like is Hey Jude, even if it seems a bit repetitive for me. Led zeppelin are far superior in my opinion.

motley_crue131 06-17-2006 08:12 PM

i rly dont like either, but i think the beatles should win. because they gave the influence for all other rock bands, and probably inspired zepplin to start as well

boo boo 06-17-2006 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill
& pedophiliac.

If Led Zeppelin are pedophiles because of the cover for Houses Of The Holy then Nirvana are pedophiles for the cover of Nevermind, oddly enough, Cobain even said anyone who found the cover offesnive is a closet pedophile.

So if you think the Houses Of The Holy cover is offensive, you're a pedophile. ;)

Most modern rock album covers are pretty grotesque and perverted... Especially in the case of metal, punk and even some emo and indie... It all makes the Houses The Holy and Nevermind covers seem pretty tame by comparison.

bungalow 06-17-2006 10:06 PM

No, they are pedophiles because they had sex with young children, nothing to do with album covers.

boo boo 06-17-2006 10:09 PM

Care prove any of that?... Because i have a got feeling you're full of shit.

Closest thing to pedophilia in Zeps case is Page's relationship with a minor, who was like 15 or something... Which is nothing worse than what Jerry Lee Lewis has done.

bungalow 06-17-2006 10:10 PM

Yeah, that is called pedophillia.
So we shouldn't arrest serial killers who have killed 9 people, because there are people who have killed 12?
That's your logic.

boo boo 06-17-2006 10:11 PM

Calling a band crap because of their personal lives is the difinition of dumb logic.

John married a total bitch, so The Beatles suck ass.

bungalow 06-17-2006 10:12 PM

I didn't call them crap.

boo boo 06-17-2006 10:12 PM

Calling Zep and Nirvana crap makes up at least half of your entire post count.

bungalow 06-17-2006 10:13 PM

Okay, calling Modest Mouse crap, or defending Nirvana makes up more than half of yours.

boo boo 06-17-2006 10:15 PM

I have called MM crap at least 3 or 4 times on MB.

bungalow 06-17-2006 10:17 PM

I'm not going to argue about this, but you had an entire argument with Ex D about it.

boo boo 06-17-2006 10:30 PM

It wasn't that big, i said something about MM, she asked why i hate them so much, i gave my reasons, she made some response i don't even remember and that was it.

Demonoid 05-16-2008 10:58 PM

how did this one get bumped?(or am i just seeing things:confused:)
Anyways, w/o reading the last 11 pages, both are awesome imo!
Hard to decide which one I've listened to more...(i didn't have last.fm installed at that time)

Rainard Jalen 05-17-2008 12:30 AM

It's a very strange question, given that the bands have virtually nothing in common at all other than being English.

Piss Me Off 05-17-2008 03:52 AM

I guess because they're both seen as massively influential, and are two of the most popular bands ever.

Alfred 05-17-2008 09:41 AM

The Who.

Dr_Rez 05-17-2008 11:05 AM

Another dumb vs. thread....great!

Urban Hat€monger ? 05-17-2008 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RezZ (Post 480852)
Another dumb vs. thread....great!

Yes but it's a dumb thread started by the guy who started the site so have some respect damn you.

Dr_Rez 05-18-2008 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger (Post 480895)
Yes but it's a dumb thread started by the guy who started the site so have some respect damn you.

It is from back in 03 though. And regardless of who it was created by, it still doesn't change that.

Rainard Jalen 05-18-2008 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RezZ (Post 481073)
It is from back in 03 though. And regardless of who it was created by, it still doesn't change that.

It has nostalgic/sentimental/associative value and that is more significant, even I agree with that.

sl1ck 05-18-2008 06:34 PM

I don't like either, but The Beatles are the lesser of two evils.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:06 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.