This is something you've researched then... Interesting.

Michael Vick - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_fig..._United_States

"Despite legality issues, dogs are still commonly used for fighting purposes all across the continent."

"The United States Humane Society estimates that more than 40,000 people across the country buy and sell fighting dogs and are involved in dogfighting activities."

And what happened to him?

LOL LOL LOL

Oh dudes, this is just way too easy. Come on, surely you can do better than this.

He became starting Quarterback for the Philadelphia Eagles and made millions upon millions.

After what? :rofl:

C'mon bud, don't be so evasive.

I'll give you a hint:

http://a.espncdn.com/i/mag/blog/1126reilly.jpg

Vick went on to make millions more lol

That's besides the point tho.... actually what exactly is ur point? Mine is that there's s much different culture in sports and locker rooms and that makes this incignito story less shockin and somewhat over exagerated. Whsts urs again? Is there one??

You've been suggesting that people don't do these things despite it being part of their subculture. I provided evidence that they do. If anyone's being evasive it's you, kid.

I'd be pretty okay with going to prison for 21 months if it meant I'd be making millions of dollars once I got out rofl.

Your phone fixes caps but doesn't have spellcheck. Jesus Christ, man, was that even English?

But no, he went to prison (how could he make millions more before the fact LOL), because he broke the law. Glad I could straighten that out for ya.

NFL - Michael Vick's 548 days behind bars - ESPN The Magazine - ESPN

Your point is entirely moot, because it's based off of your personal sentiments.

An argument with personal sentiments and references to actual situations that are clearly happening is better than your argument with no personal sentiments, no evidence, and frankly no logic whatsoever either. Go take a debate class if you want people to take you seriously.

No, I suggested that they're against the law, I questioned whether they actually happened so you would once again prove my point for me. You never cease to amaze me in that department.

As for the money argument, just LOL. Now it's about money. You jump from one subject to another very erratically. First it was about Incognito, and whether he was wrong, then it somehow became about reality, it became about laws, now it's about money. See, I can at least see how reality, laws and what not are related to this story, but now it's about money. All I can say is C'MON MAN.