i want the next argument in this topic to be about which la parka is the real la parka

wait what are you talking about

it factually has no ties to wwe and is funded by Vince

that isn’t an opinion, it’s a fact.

also comparing the WWE’s numbers to the UFC/any MMA organization is the most non-sensical point you couldve made considering one is a performance art and the other is one of the most physically intense methods of combat around.

wrestling is a spectacle. sure, maybe during the days of Hogan and Andre thr Giant people wanted real. but now it’s known and accepted that these are trained professionals out there to put on a show.

this is where frownland would say something about seperating your personal opinions from facts etc etc

the answer is l.a. park btw

i wish i could erase the la parka tna run from my mind

So it's funded by Vince but has no ties to the WWE.
Oh boy.

So people don't want something that's realistic, or that they can sort of believe in because it's not 1982 anymore? Lol.

which la parka are you voting for, maajo

La Parka is still around? I remember watching that guy on Nitro back in 1997.

thanks for picking l.a. park

I had no idea there was even another La Parka. Shows how much I watch wrestling now.

you understand that the WWE is a company right?

the original XFL was owned by the company. the new company is owned by Vince McMahon and saw him buy the rights to certain trademarks from the WWE themselves and saw him selling shares of the WWE in order to fund the XFL himself

i dunno how i can make it any more clear to you regarding these two points but if you’re gonna keep sticking your tongue out and plugging your ears go for it.

people don’t watch wrestling for realism because its 2018 and the internet has been around long enough that any mystique surrounding the spectacle that was the WWF has long died off.