Most overrated bands ever?

Kempson · 11-01-2005, 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

WRONG.

Hence why I said "arguably" because I knew somebody would disagree.

boo boo · 11-01-2005, 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kempson

Hence why I said "arguably" because I knew somebody would disagree.

Motorhead - Aces of Spades

They were thrash metal before Metallica were.

Kempson · 11-01-2005, 02:29 AM

Okay I've been proved wrong on that one, but the thrash metal genre does owe a lot to Metallica.

boo boo · 11-01-2005, 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kempson

Okay I've been proved wrong on that one, but the thrash metal genre does owe a lot to Metallica.

Of course, just like how Grunge owes a lot to Nirvana, regardless if they invented it or not.

Kempson · 11-01-2005, 02:37 AM

Of course, credit to Nirvana. I was just arguing with what _LesPaul43_ posted:

Quote:

Well i dont like Nirvana at all....but they are not ovre-rated........they created and brought a new genre of music to mainstream...they were reated just how they shouldbe.........and Metallica is over rated

BFstreet_team · 11-03-2005, 09:36 AM

The Rolling Stones. I'm sorry...legendary yes. But one of the best bands in the world? Technically? No way.

dogman · 11-05-2005, 01:59 AM

nirvana.
people go on about how they changed music. how???
they didn't invent anything new, their style was not ground breaking, plenty of bands play that kind of music.
i think if cobain wasn't attractive and he didn't die, nirvana would be thought about in a whole new light.

Spikey · 11-05-2005, 08:18 AM

I agree totally

There must always be something new. I find that you end up thinking where's that from? Or heard that before..But that's happening less and less now.

boo boo · 11-05-2005, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dogman

nirvana.
people go on about how they changed music. how???
they didn't invent anything new, their style was not ground breaking, plenty of bands play that kind of music.
i think if cobain wasn't attractive and he didn't die, nirvana would be thought about in a whole new light.

*Farts*

~~bungalow~~ · 11-05-2005, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

*Farts*

haha...once again....you turn into a sarcastic **** when someone disagrees with you on nirvana

11-05-2005, 08:18 AM	#558 (permalink)
Spikey Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 277	I agree totally There must always be something new. I find that you end up thinking where's that from? Or heard that before..But that's happening less and less now. __________________ www.myspace.com/emeraldskyrock

11-01-2005, 02:29 AM	#553 (permalink)
Kempson Music Addict Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: UK Posts: 193	Okay I've been proved wrong on that one, but the thrash metal genre does owe a lot to Metallica.

11-03-2005, 09:36 AM	#556 (permalink)
BFstreet_team Groupie Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 16	The Rolling Stones. I'm sorry...legendary yes. But one of the best bands in the world? Technically? No way.

11-05-2005, 01:59 AM	#557 (permalink)
dogman Groupie Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: aussie Posts: 9	nirvana. people go on about how they changed music. how??? they didn't invent anything new, their style was not ground breaking, plenty of bands play that kind of music. i think if cobain wasn't attractive and he didn't die, nirvana would be thought about in a whole new light.