Most overrated bands ever?

AshleighJane · 05-31-2009, 05:04 PM

lol...the Foo Fighters, Devil Wears Prada, Metrostation, Nickelback, and Stone Temple Pilots

Mirrorball95 · 05-31-2009, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Comus

People will always like crap music, get over it.

It isnt crap just because you dont happen to like it though. I think what you meant was people will always have differing tastes in music.

Also I must enter this as being massively overrated & I now think Kings Of Leon truly suck balls since they went and did a 'lets copy U2' with the latest album.
Thier previous albums, especially 'Because Of The Times' in particular were pretty good though.

lieasleep · 05-31-2009, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mirrorball95

It isnt crap just because you dont happen to like it though. I think what you meant was people will always have differing tastes in music.

then how do we measure music? "kevin ferderline didn't make 'bad' music, it just wasn't your taste" is not a sentence i ever want to hear

Fruitonica · 05-31-2009, 07:22 PM

We don't 'measure music'. If you want to pretend musical quality is anything other than subjective your just trying to give yourself an ego boost.

Antonio · 05-31-2009, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AshleighJane

lol...the Foo Fighters, Devil Wears Prada, Metrostation, Nickelback, and Stone Temple Pilots

haha didn't you say you needed to download Foo Fighters earlier?

lieasleep · 05-31-2009, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fruitonica

We don't 'measure music'. If you want to pretend musical quality is anything other than subjective your just trying to give yourself an ego boost.

of course its subjective, i'm not trying to kid myself.

my only point is that music is graded and rated all the time in reviews, and even regular people rate it in terms of good or bad, so of course music is subjective and i'm sure that some people will like kevin federline, katie perry, and other b.s. but that does not make it 'good' music.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AshleighJane

lol...the Foo Fighters

i agree with that entirely, simple, plain, emotionless, uninspired rock.

Mirrorball95 · 06-01-2009, 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lieasleep

of course its subjective, i'm not trying to kid myself.

my only point is that music is graded and rated all the time in reviews, and even regular people rate it in terms of good or bad, so of course music is subjective and i'm sure that some people will like kevin federline, katie perry, and other b.s. but that does not make it 'good' music.

i agree with that entirely, simple, plain, emotionless, uninspired rock.

Yeah but the reviews in the magazines just happen to be published opinions of people just like you and me, also popular opinion shouldnt have any influence when forming your own opinion.
It doesnt make it 'bad' music either though. Just not to your taste.

As for the Foo Fighters, they shouldnt be totally slated for everything they do as they have done some good music (particularly the first album & 'There Is Nothing Left To Lose', also I enjoyed 'In Your Honour'). I agree they are overrated in the sense that they are what I would call an inconsistent band. They put out a good album and then a sh1t one. So I can understand people hear a certain album after hearing a good one then lose interest. I wouldnt describe them as 'simple','plain', 'emotionless', 'uninspired' though. There are a lot more plain, uninspired rock bands out there than the Foo Fighters. I think you were a bit harsh there.

AshleighJane · 06-01-2009, 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lieasleep

of course its subjective, i'm not trying to kid myself.

my only point is that music is graded and rated all the time in reviews, and even regular people rate it in terms of good or bad, so of course music is subjective and i'm sure that some people will like kevin federline, katie perry, and other b.s. but that does not make it 'good' music.

i agree with that entirely, simple, plain, emotionless, uninspired rock.

exactly my point....

~~The Unfan~~ · 06-01-2009, 09:30 AM

I think it seems to depend on how you view Foo Fighters. I like them, but I also consider them to be more of a solid pop act.

Brad Stengel · 06-01-2009, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Unfan

I think it seems to depend on how you view Foo Fighters. I like them, but I also consider them to be more of a solid pop act.

I would consider them a patchy pop act at best. Grohl's first album was good, the singles from Colour and the Shape are great, but I haven't heard a good song by them since Best of You.

05-31-2009, 05:04 PM	#2341 (permalink)
AshleighJane Music Addict Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 88	lol...the Foo Fighters, Devil Wears Prada, Metrostation, Nickelback, and Stone Temple Pilots __________________ My love....If only he was still alive♥

05-31-2009, 07:22 PM	#2344 (permalink)
Fruitonica Pale and Wan Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Aus Posts: 917	We don't 'measure music'. If you want to pretend musical quality is anything other than subjective your just trying to give yourself an ego boost.

06-01-2009, 09:30 AM	#2349 (permalink)
~~The Unfan~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Methville Posts: 2,116	I think it seems to depend on how you view Foo Fighters. I like them, but I also consider them to be more of a solid pop act.