|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||
|
Dr. Prunk
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,156
|
Judging punk entirely on The Sex Pistols is like judging prog entirely on ELP.
Which unfortunately a lot of people do in both cases. And I wouldn't really call a song like God Save the Queen safe, at least in it's lyrical content. Though I think in itself, Sex Pistols weren't really safe, because to be safe you have to be at least competent musicians, and The Sex Pistols were so freaking awful that there was indeed something fresh and defiant about their music. Quote:
Just because their guitarist didn't give shred solos and make stupid "emotional" faces doesn't mean they lacked energy, if anything, energy was the one thing they had going for them. Quote:
![]() I don't really know where you get the machoism in punk thing from. I see a lot more women involved in punk than with prog. Hell, Rush were notoriously sexist, I say that even as a fan. Since you hate punk and love prog, you'll probably get a kick out of these, or lose your shit and send your fist through the monitor. One or the other. Death to the Beatles. History Of Punk - Genesis, ELP & Yes The History Of Punk - Tommy, Jethro Tull, Rick Wakeman & King Crimson I remember reading these a few years and they sent me into a fanboy rage, saying stuff like "Punk fans with their short attention spans and utter disgust for talent wouldn't know music if it bit them in the ass". But now I just laugh at the stupidity of such elitists, and you should too. I love prog AND punk, and I'm really tired of people who still think there's some kind of war going on. Can't we all just get along? |
||
|
|
|
|