The Beatles vs The Beach Boys - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Pop
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2010, 07:20 PM   #121 (permalink)
Killed Laura Palmer
 
ThePhanastasio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ashland, KY
Posts: 1,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edzeppelin View Post
They are both influential legends. Try this, listen to the following songs back to back. Don't even try to pick which are better, just listen to how good they both sound right after each other:

Across The Universe-Surf's Up (Brian piano solo version)

In My Life-God Only Knows

Because-Can't Wait Too Long

Mother Nature's Son-Add Some Music To Your Day

Everybody's Got Something To Hide Except Me And My Monkey-It's About Time

All You Need Is Love-Wouldn't It Be Nice

And there are countless others. Give it a try and see what you think


Good call there.

I think they're both exceptionally good, but in different ways. Both bands were able to write really superb pop songs, and both were quite brilliant bands.

I still feel almost like truly comparing the two is really difficult to do, as listening to either band tends to evoke different (although by no means lesser) feelings.

I also disagree greatly with the far earlier post(s) (first page) saying that McCartney's bass work was far superior; much of the Beach Boys' bass session work (see Pet Sounds) was actually done by the superb Carol Kaye, who is my absolute favorite session bassist of all time.
ThePhanastasio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2010, 09:58 PM   #122 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 16
Default

Definitely Beatles for me. But they both are good in their own merits. They have unique styles, yet they influence each other in terms of writing songs.
Lilmay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2010, 07:19 AM   #123 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1
Default

Beach Boys!
frankvoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2010, 10:05 PM   #124 (permalink)
Groupie
 
npc210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.
Posts: 35
Default

The Beatles, if only because their catalog is much more diverse, though both are among my favorite bands.
npc210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2010, 09:13 PM   #125 (permalink)
Key
.
 
Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13,153
Default

I prefer The Beach Boys over the Beatles. The Beach Boys are just so much more relaxing to listen to, and I don't have to try and figure out what they're trying to sing about. The Beatles were great, but their music tends to be very very confusing.
Key is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 02:04 AM   #126 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
musiclistsareus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 64
Default

Beach Boys stayed together longer b 0 bb 1
Beatles had more big hits b 1 bb 1
Carl wilson>Lennon>Paul as a solo vocalist b 1 bb 2
Lennon+Paul>Carl+Brian as solo vocalists b 2 bb 2
Harrison>Carl as a guitarist b 3 bb 2
Brian>McCartney>Lennon as music composers b 3 bb 3
McCartney+Lennon+Harrison>wilson bros as composers b 4 bb 3
Lennon>all bb lyricists b 5 bb 3
as harmony vocalists bb>b b 5 bb 4
as a producer Brian vs George Martin too close to call
Ringo>Dennis as a drummer b 6 bb 4
as innovators beatles>beach boys b 7 bb 4
as bassist Macca>Brian b 8 bb 4
bb session drummer Hal Blaine>ringo (maybe) b 8 bb 5

I'm sure I've neglected some areas but it looks like Beatles but it's not a runaway.
musiclistsareus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 06:32 AM   #127 (permalink)
one-balled nipple jockey
 
OccultHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dirty Souf Biatch
Posts: 22,033
Default

Quote:
bb session drummer Hal Blaine>ringo (maybe) b 8 bb 5
Appreciating Ringo is subtle business but I think he's the only one in the world who would have come up with a lot of those beats exactly as they are and that plays a major and often overlooked role in The Beatles sound and what made it so intriguing. Ringo, during his time as a Beatle at least, was also a master or knowing when and what NOT to play greatly assisting The Beatles' ethereal qualities. The Beatles' mystical edge and intangible beauty would have been compromised by any other drummer I can think of. For my money, Ringo is the greatest rock'n'roll drummer to ever live.
OccultHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 11:44 AM   #128 (permalink)
And then there was music
 
Badlittlekitten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Near Wild Heaven
Posts: 287
Default

Beatles all the way. Far more diverse and consistent. I love Pet Sounds but it's just one album.
__________________
'Said do you feel it? Do you feel it when you TOUCH ME?. THERE'S A FIRE! THERE'S A FIRE!' The Stooges. Dirt.

https://soundcloud.com/bad-little-kittens
My Top 100 LPs
My Top 52 Indie Tracks Of The 21st Century (incomplete)
Badlittlekitten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 07:27 PM   #129 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
poppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New England Ma.( snow country )
Posts: 124
Default

If i had a choice i would say the beatles by a mile!
poppie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2010, 07:32 PM   #130 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by poppie View Post
If i had a choice i would say the beatles by a mile!
You do have a choice.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.