Revolution #9 does anyone like it?

WeeLittleHobbit · 12-02-2008, 05:08 PM

Fair enough. Would you consider this a song?

cardboard adolescent · 12-02-2008, 05:10 PM

absolutely. "song" is just a marketing term as far as i'm concerned.

WeeLittleHobbit · 12-02-2008, 05:13 PM

Hmmmm.... interesting logic. Well if you look at it that way, then just about anything could be labeled a "song."

cardboard adolescent · 12-02-2008, 05:28 PM

**Janszoon** · 12-02-2008, 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeeLittleHobbit

Well where would you draw the line from music to noise? I think something like Revolution 9 isn't really music, but more drug-induced-thought-provoking noise/sounds, or something to that effect.

I draw the line according to intent. If the organized sounds were intended to be music by its creator then I consider it to be music.

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeeLittleHobbit

Hmmmm.... interesting logic. Well if you look at it that way, then just about anything could be labeled a "song."

Pretty much yeah.

Akira · 12-02-2008, 05:57 PM

Hard to draw a line when 'noise' is a 'genre' of music.

Anti-Christ · 12-02-2008, 11:33 PM

It's pretty good, I don't hold it to such high regard as others do though.

Bulldog · 12-03-2008, 09:45 AM

It's alright I suppose. Wasn't completely blown away by it, as I'm sure I would have been had I listened to it in '68

Urban Hat€monger ? · 12-03-2008, 12:57 PM

I think it's crap personally.

I look at The Beatles attempts at avant garde in the same way as I look at the Rolling Stones attempts at psychedelia. In that if you are a fan of either band you can probably find something to enjoy about them.

If you're not they're just bollocks.

Mark Lint · 12-12-2008, 09:13 PM

I feel like Rev #9 is short enough and has enough pleasant elements in it to feel right on the album, much like the shooting and noises on Pink Floyd's The Wall... I think it's good theater.

However, take a listen to the John and Yoko stuff from that time like "Two Virgins" or "The Wedding Album." It's the same thing but like 40 minutes of that crap. Absolutely unlistenable. There's a reason why those albums are basically forgotten.

12-02-2008, 05:08 PM	#11 (permalink)
WeeLittleHobbit The Stain Specialist Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Maryland Posts: 312	Fair enough. Would you consider this a song? __________________ Tommy: I'm funny how? Funny like a clown? I amuse you? I'm here to fcking amuse you? What do you mean, funny? How am I funny? Henry: You know, how you tell a story. Tommy*: I don't know. You said it. You said I'm funny. How am I funny?

12-02-2008, 05:13 PM	#13 (permalink)
WeeLittleHobbit The Stain Specialist Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Maryland Posts: 312	Hmmmm.... interesting logic. Well if you look at it that way, then just about anything could be labeled a "song." __________________ Tommy: I'm funny how? Funny like a clown? I amuse you? I'm here to fcking amuse you? What do you mean, funny? How am I funny? Henry: You know, how you tell a story. Tommy*: I don't know. You said it. You said I'm funny. How am I funny?

12-02-2008, 11:33 PM	#17 (permalink)
Anti-Christ Groupie Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Hell, I wish :( Posts: 39	It's pretty good, I don't hold it to such high regard as others do though. __________________ "It's not even important to be remembered"

12-03-2008, 12:57 PM	#19 (permalink)
Urban Hat€monger ? The Sexual Intellectual Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere cooler than you Posts: 18,605	I think it's crap personally. I look at The Beatles attempts at avant garde in the same way as I look at the Rolling Stones attempts at psychedelia. In that if you are a fan of either band you can probably find something to enjoy about them. If you're not they're just bollocks. __________________ Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-02-2008, 05:10 PM	#12 (permalink)
cardboard adolescent ;) Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: CA Posts: 3,503	absolutely. "song" is just a marketing term as far as i'm concerned.

12-02-2008, 05:28 PM	#14 (permalink)
cardboard adolescent ;) Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: CA Posts: 3,503

12-03-2008, 09:45 AM	#18 (permalink)
Bulldog why bother? Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: UK Posts: 4,840	It's alright I suppose. Wasn't completely blown away by it, as I'm sure I would have been had I listened to it in '68

12-12-2008, 09:13 PM	#20 (permalink)
Mark Lint Groupie Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 16	I feel like Rev #9 is short enough and has enough pleasant elements in it to feel right on the album, much like the shooting and noises on Pink Floyd's The Wall... I think it's good theater. However, take a listen to the John and Yoko stuff from that time like "Two Virgins" or "The Wedding Album." It's the same thing but like 40 minutes of that crap. Absolutely unlistenable. There's a reason why those albums are basically forgotten.