The Wow I Can't Believe That News Story Thread

[DwnWthVwls]

Then point out the bias in my argument, lol.

[OccultHawk]

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

*rationale*!!!

So how is that different than the position you guys are taking with Catholics exactly? That's the question I was expecting you to answer.

My disdain is definitely real but I dont see what that has to do with my argument. Junkies are pieces of shit, but if we have the resources to help them we should. My emotions about them as people is not reflected in my reasoning because I separate the bias.

lol

He’s got your bitch asses pinned to a wall. You can argue I’m full of **** for hating on Muslims but when it’s Catholics you did the same ****ing thing. You are so busted it’s hilarious

[OccultHawk]

This is different with Muslims because they do not have an infallible, central authority who dictates what they do and do not believe so they are not inherently responsible for the actions of Islamic terrorists.

lol you know damn well they got ayatollahs and imans and bin ladens and Saudi princes and assads and saddams

plus it’s a ticky tack excuse just like dwv predicted

just admit he called it

[Frownland]

That silly gotcha would make a lot more sense if anyone here was maligning Christianity for the actions committed under Catholicism.

[The Batlord]

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

Then point out the bias in my argument, lol.

I'm not pointing out your bias in this specific instance about Catholicism. I'm pointing out that you have a bias in another discussion. I thought you were asking in general.

Originally Posted by OccultHawk

lol

He’s got your bitch asses pinned to a wall. You can argue I’m full of **** for hating on Muslims but when it’s Catholics you did the same ****ing thing. You are so busted it’s hilarious

I've already explained it several times, dip****.

Originally Posted by OccultHawk

lol you know damn well they got ayatollahs and imans and bin ladens and Saudi princes and assads and saddams

plus it’s a ticky tack excuse just like dwv predicted

just admit he called it

If a Muslim actively adheres to a specific Islamic religious leader who supports terrorism then yes they are responsible for supporting terrorism, but if they do not then they are not responsible for it. This is basic logic. What do you choose to not understand?

And Assad and Saddam are/were not religious leaders. How much of a prejudiced ignoramus do you have to be to make that connection? Are Christians responsible in a religious sense for the actions of Barrack Obama?

[OccultHawk]

*Barack

keep squirming but your asses are strapped to the electric chair

[DwnWthVwls]

Originally Posted by Dharma & Greg

I'm not pointing out your bias in this specific instance about Catholicism. I'm pointing out that you have a bias in another discussion. I thought you were asking in general.

I was just asking what is biased about my junkie argument, since you insist that there is some underlying bias in my position because I personally dislike junkies.

Originally Posted by Dharma & Greg

If a Catholic actively adheres to a specific Catholic religious leader who supports pedophilia then yes they are responsible for supporting pedophilia, but if they do not then they are not responsible for it. This is basic logic.

I'm glad we agree.

Calling them bad catholics doesnt make them less catholic, unless you want to argue on behalf of the scotsman.

[The Batlord]

Originally Posted by OccultHawk

*Barack

keep squirming but your asses are strapped to the electric chair

Is this why you've stopped even attempting to argue any points and are cheerleading someone else?

[DwnWthVwls]

I'm just waiting for that *oh shit, I'm a derp* moment to settle in so we can get on to better topics.

[The Batlord]

Originally Posted by DwnWthVwls

I was just asking what is biased about my junkie argument, since you insist that it is.

I mean we already had that discussion ad nauseum and I'm not really interested in restarting it tbh. I only brought it up as an example because you asked about you having bias in general.

I'm glad we agree.

Calling them bad catholics doesnt make them less catholic, unless you want to argue on behalf of the scotsman.

Again, Papal infallibility. If you disagree with or criticize the Pope then you are a bad Catholic. Catholics are expressly not allowed to disagree with the Church. In past centuries people would be excommunicated or burned at the stake for it but I imagine the Church realizes that this would be a non-starter in this day and age so Catholics have been given a level of unofficial autonomy not through doctrine but through pragmatism.

My grandfather is Catholic af but is a conservative who condemns the current Pope as a socialist and I'd say that makes him a bad Catholic.