Originally Posted by jwb (Post 2097443)

You can either make an interesting counter argument or I don't care what you have to say about it

Originally Posted by WWWP (Post 2097449)

I mean I'm kind of with elph on the incest question, if there is no breeding there is less of a problem - but parent/child relationships are 100% always creepy af and there's no way to have real consent in a relationship with such a ****ed up power dynamic. But where would the world be without inbreds? Do you really want to live in a world without the royals and/or pugs?

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 2097450)

Then make an interesting argument, Ayn Rand.

Originally Posted by jwb (Post 2097439)

^it's hard when my phone's auto correct is probably designed in NK


I know that. Are you of the opinion that capitalism and socialism are the only 2 systems to ever exist?


virtually no agreements or contracts are ever equal sided whether you're talking business or otherwise. By default one party usually has more leverage than the other.

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 2097455)

No, I mentioned communism. You suck at counting.

Originally Posted by jwb (Post 2097456)

I was thinking that's a form of socialism

So then to you those have been the only systems? In other words, feudalism is capitalism to you?

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 2097458)

No, but feudalism isn't really relevant. I just named the ones that are.

Originally Posted by jwb (Post 2097460)

I would think that the definition of a system would differentiate from past systems as well

And really in this day and age communism is basically irrelevant too if you wanna be real about it.

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 2097461)

Just because you think it's unrealistic doesn't mean it's irrelevant.

Originally Posted by jwb (Post 2097462)

It doesn't exist currently

So what makes it more relevant than feudalism?