Indecision 2008 -what do you think????? (country, house, American, show) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Who will it be?
Obama 42 79.25%
McCain 5 9.43%
**** you RezZ, I'm not telling you! 6 11.32%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-21-2008, 10:06 AM   #121 (permalink)
Existential Egoist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double X View Post
I'm not advocating for socialism (would not be against it though) but if we can take money from some people to help boost up another class why not. Using that money to get homeless and poor people more work would help this country greatly.
I understand that you want to help other people in need and I am all for that, but I don't see how it is moral at all to steal from the rich and give to the poor. The fact of the matter is that I don't really care about the country as a whole, and I see myself as an individual in this world. Since I have only one perspective, why should I decide how another person should forcibly give there money away when they don't want to. It isn't a matter of being selfish at all. It is a matter of protecting someones basic rights of doing what they want with their property.

Quote:
I don't want America in another Gilded Age. The wealthiest are breaking farther and farther away from everyone else at the rest of the American people's expense.
The reason is because of the huge amounts of taxes on the middle class, which will increase with socialized health-care. These taxes also stop more people from getting rich, which theoretically stops more people from giving money. This is because in the large middle class, there are probably more people who would give more. If these people were able to get more money, they may give that money away.
Inuzuka Skysword is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 08:30 PM   #122 (permalink)
sleepe
 
Double X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: boston
Posts: 1,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayJamJah View Post
Why should the wealthy be held accountable for that?

What have they done to limit others from obtaining wealth?

If you give people hand outs you take away their motivation, it is not good for the country. You create a sense of entitlement and apathy in people as well. It will only give them a temporary boost as well, it's not as if we can pull the destitute from the ranks of poverty with money. They need a change in lifestyle and attitude first.

The extremely wealthy already give back more then half of their income in taxes and are responsible for more then 3/4 the charitable donations in this country.

When the government takes money it uses it poorly. The biggest problem I have with your idea is that. You are saying you trust the government more then the citizens to do what's right. I don't like that at all.

Government socialized health care is lazy, selfish and ultimately unfair.
I completely trust the citizens, they will do good with the money they are given to get off their feet. I don't get why you claim poor people won't do anything with money and then say I don't believe in the citizens.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
I understand that you want to help other people in need and I am all for that, but I don't see how it is moral at all to steal from the rich and give to the poor. The fact of the matter is that I don't really care about the country as a whole, and I see myself as an individual in this world. Since I have only one perspective, why should I decide how another person should forcibly give there money away when they don't want to. It isn't a matter of being selfish at all. It is a matter of protecting someones basic rights of doing what they want with their property.


The reason is because of the huge amounts of taxes on the middle class, which will increase with socialized health-care. These taxes also stop more people from getting rich, which theoretically stops more people from giving money. This is because in the large middle class, there are probably more people who would give more. If these people were able to get more money, they may give that money away.
When people struggle to live, we should help them. It's silly to think that someone wants their basic rights to be protected just so they can hoard more of their money.

Taxing the middle class over the top is crazy, but I think we can tax many of the wealthy families who just save their money so their great great grandchildren don't have to work.
Double X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 08:48 PM   #123 (permalink)
Occams Razor
 
Son of JayJamJah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: End of the Earth
Posts: 2,472
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double X View Post
I think we can tax many of the wealthy families who just save their money so their great great grandchildren don't have to work.
So if rich people are given money they won't work hard, but if poor people are given money they will?

I know you don't think that, but do you see what I mean. Endless hand outs take away motivation. Endless handouts (i.e welfare, rent control, those who abuse unemployment etc) take away motivation. Endless handouts are the socialist solution.

I would rather leave it up to the private citizens like you and I'd like to think my self who are willing to sacrifice what they can to help those less fortunate. Don't force people to do it, especially when there are no results to show for their efforts.

I love where your heart is, I am only arguing the best way to accomplish what we both want.
__________________
Me, Myself and I United as One

Quote:
Originally Posted by cardboard adolescent View Post
i prefer foreplay. the orgasm is overrated.
If you're posting in the music forums make sure to be thoughtful and expressive, if you're posting in the lounge ask yourself "is this something that adds to the conversation?" It's important to remember that a lot of people use each thread. You're probably not as funny or clever as you think, I know I'm not.

My Van Morrison Discography Thread
Son of JayJamJah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 01:33 AM   #124 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
bsmix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: California
Posts: 179
Default

i thought that was kind of rude ghahaha so i said mccain to be mean
__________________
a music nazi....is still a nazi
bsmix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 08:53 AM   #125 (permalink)
Existential Egoist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double X View Post
When people struggle to live, we should help them. It's silly to think that someone wants their basic rights to be protected just so they can hoard more of their money.

Taxing the middle class over the top is crazy, but I think we can tax many of the wealthy families who just save their money so their great great grandchildren don't have to work.
The fact is that I don't see how you should have the authority over someone else's property who doesn't want you to. It would be like me coming over to your house and taking your computer because I want to give it to someone else. While that doesn't perfectly match up because the rich could just buy a new one, rich people are quite stingy and do not want other hands on there money. Therefore, I don't think we are morally right and taking there money, whatever the cause. It is kind of like respecting a culture when you go to another country. You want to do something they are doing, but it is a matter of respect.
Inuzuka Skysword is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 09:34 AM   #126 (permalink)
sleepe
 
Double X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: boston
Posts: 1,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayJamJah View Post
So if rich people are given money they won't work hard, but if poor people are given money they will?

I know you don't think that, but do you see what I mean. Endless hand outs take away motivation. Endless handouts (i.e welfare, rent control, those who abuse unemployment etc) take away motivation. Endless handouts are the socialist solution.

I would rather leave it up to the private citizens like you and I'd like to think my self who are willing to sacrifice what they can to help those less fortunate. Don't force people to do it, especially when there are no results to show for their efforts.

I love where your heart is, I am only arguing the best way to accomplish what we both want.
That's the problem - I know it's not morally right to 'steal' other peoples property and give them to less fortunate people but I still see the insanely wide gap between the few rich and the poor masses and they don't donate nearly as much as they could.

And I don't want endless handouts, I want more money to give direction (ie welfare checks only if you actually have a job with at least 28 hours a week, private counselors who work with these people to get them off their feer, not a closed window that poops checks).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
The fact is that I don't see how you should have the authority over someone else's property who doesn't want you to. It would be like me coming over to your house and taking your computer because I want to give it to someone else. While that doesn't perfectly match up because the rich could just buy a new one, rich people are quite stingy and do not want other hands on there money. Therefore, I don't think we are morally right and taking there money, whatever the cause. It is kind of like respecting a culture when you go to another country. You want to do something they are doing, but it is a matter of respect.
I can't bear myself to let that happen. When the richer are just hoarding their money it seems so much worse than raising taxes so we actually do stuff with that money.
Double X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 10:28 AM   #127 (permalink)
Existential Egoist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double X View Post
I can't bear myself to let that happen. When the richer are just hoarding their money it seems so much worse than raising taxes so we actually do stuff with that money.
Now you sound like a fundamentalist Christian...

I mean, it is exactly like that. You think you know utopia, and since yours will interfere with others freedoms it becomes a problem.

Like I said, it is just like bringing religion into politics.
Inuzuka Skysword is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 03:11 PM   #128 (permalink)
sleepe
 
Double X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: boston
Posts: 1,140
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inuzuka Skysword View Post
Now you sound like a fundamentalist Christian...

I mean, it is exactly like that. You think you know utopia, and since yours will interfere with others freedoms it becomes a problem.

Like I said, it is just like bringing religion into politics.
So you would rather 'let things sort themselves out' and watch people starve on the streets?

Do we need taxes at all? I mean it is their property, no?
Double X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 05:51 PM   #129 (permalink)
Existential Egoist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double X View Post
So you would rather 'let things sort themselves out' and watch people starve on the streets?
No, you do what any truly generous person would. You give up everything you own and give it to the poor since you care so much for them. I doubt you will, so you really don't care about them as much as you think you do.

The point is that until your own property is on the line, you won't show your true colors.


Quote:
Do we need taxes at all? I mean it is their property, no?
A Revelation! I ask myself the same question and people always respond by calling me an idealist.
Inuzuka Skysword is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 07:55 PM   #130 (permalink)
Existential Egoist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,468
Default

This is a debate. If you don't want to, then don't post.
Inuzuka Skysword is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.