Originally Posted by oojay

I'm offended at those who find it offensive, what a vicious cycle. Who are we to police personal thought?

Originally Posted by Il Duce

- Hendrix didn't even play the blues that well -

Originally Posted by RezZ

Women should not get equal pay until they can be drafted and are required by law to pay for at least half of the money spent on a date. Once that happens then **** yes of coarse they should.

Originally Posted by RezZ

Because men need that extra money they make to spend on there girls/dates dinner and such. So in the end it evens out.

And a women would have to register with there local government and receive a card. This card gives them that extra salary boost and is required to be shown on a date while paying.

Although I do seriously mean the first thing I said. I know theres no war now but if a man can get taken from everything and killed then I think he does deserve something extra in someway.

Originally Posted by RezZ

Yea the date thing was a joke. Thats entirely up to women to do. It really should be whomever asks whomever out. I just went on this date with a girl who asked me out and I was about to pay and she stepped in and said ill get it I asked you out. I thought that was pretty classy.

And yes I am very aware of that draft fact, but it is definitly somehting that should be brought to light when women's rights activists bring the issue up. To men by law it is considered "your right" to be drafted.

I would very much like to know womens rights activists opinion on this matter, as id be interested in there interpretation.

Originally Posted by RezZ

Sime might argue but they would be wrong. When your expected role is to look after the house and children while the male goes out and not only establishes himself in the business world and brings home bread to take care of all of them he clearly has the power over the rest of his family.

That alone is the reason women go out and get jobs. They could sit at home and play housewife (nothing wrong with that) but instead they want to take charge of there own life and not rely on a man for dinner at night.

Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien

There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.

Originally Posted by The Batlord

If you're going to be a grammar nazi, at least explain yourself.

"There" implies position: The ball is over there.
"Their" implies ownership: It's their ball.
"They're" is a contraction of "they are".

Originally Posted by Dr.Seussicide

No, well, I wasn't playing grammar nazi, I just really want to know if he's doing that shit it on purpose. Four times in a row is a bit much. I assume he knows those rules already though...

Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien

There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.

Originally Posted by Paloma

homophones r difficult bro!

Originally Posted by J.R.R. Tolkien

There is only one bright spot and that is the growing habit of disgruntled men of dynamiting factories and power-stations; I hope that, encouraged now as ‘patriotism’, may remain a habit! But it won’t do any good, if it is not universal.

Originally Posted by Paloma

homophones r difficult bro!

Originally Posted by Il Duce

- Hendrix didn't even play the blues that well -

Originally Posted by Bloozcrooz

I was wondering the same thing? What are you talking about Palo?