is it ok to screw animals? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge > Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: is screwing animals ok?
yes 5 20.00%
no 12 48.00%
maybe 8 32.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-24-2014, 08:16 AM   #1 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default is it ok to screw animals?

i'm not asking cause i want to screw animals (promise). i was just thinking... what is the reason it's not ok to screw animals again? i have heard that it is wrong because sex requires consent.. but that only applies to humans. sex with a doll for example doesn't require consent. so if sex with animals requires consent then you are extending human rights to animals. in which case we probably shouldn't be slaughtering them cause we like the way they taste, or doing experiments on them that we think it would be unethical to do to humans.

the way i look at it either animals' lives aren't worth that much so we do what we please with them or they are worthy of rights in which case we are way out of line with how we currently treat them across the board. i'm having trouble finding the middle ground where slaughtering them is fine, keeping them in captivity for entertainment is fine, injecting them with **** to see what happens is fine, but screwing them is over the line.

another possible objection i thought of is maybe we consider exploitation of animals ok depending on the objective. so we consider food (farming), sport (hunting, rodeos, etc), science (experimentation), and education (zoos and ****) to be worthy causes for animal exploitation. but exploiting them for sex is wrong for whatever reason. as for what that reason is i'm not quite sure.

thoughts?
John Wilkes Booth is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 09:01 AM   #2 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 78
Default

None of those are universally considered morally sound, they're fairly controversial topics, some more than others. People just draw the line at different points and the freedom to get yourself some literal tail doesn’t tend to rate highly as a worthy cause for most people.
skyline is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 09:01 AM   #3 (permalink)
cooler commie than elph
 
Isbjørn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: In a hole, help
Posts: 2,811
Default

No.
Isbjørn is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 09:44 AM   #4 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skyline View Post
None of those are universally considered morally sound, they're fairly controversial topics, some more than others. People just draw the line at different points and the freedom to get yourself some literal tail doesn’t tend to rate highly as a worthy cause for most people.
i'd tend to think eating steak is far less controversial than screwing a cow. yet i'm not sure why my taste for steak is more important than some pervert's lust for cow parts.
John Wilkes Booth is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 10:00 AM   #5 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
i'd tend to think eating steak is far less controversial than screwing a cow. yet i'm not sure why my taste for steak is more important than some pervert's lust for cow parts.


It's not just the food industry that benifits from cows.
skyline is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 10:01 AM   #6 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

i think my point stands.
John Wilkes Booth is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 10:16 AM   #7 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
i think my point stands.
Not really, a lot of products rely on the continued butchering of animals until they can find a sustainable/affordable substitute. I'm not sure there's one product out there that requires the cow to be ****ed. Eating is also a little more of a necessity than sexual gratification. I don't think many people consider the act of killing a cow a good thing, but to keep everything chugging along the way it has it's what we're stuck doing until some dramatic changes are made. Game on the other hand leaves a lot of waste, it's not something we rely on and I consider hunting to be more humane than farming. I still consider cooking pheasants to be of more use than ****ing pheasants.
skyline is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 10:19 AM   #8 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

It's ok to screw animals as long as those animals are human.
Janszoon is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 10:24 AM   #9 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skyline View Post
Not really, a lot of products rely on the continued butchering of animals until they can find a sustainable/affordable substitute. I'm not sure there's one product out there that requires the cow to be ****ed. Eating is also a little more of a necessity than sexual gratification. I don't think many people consider the act of killing a cow a good thing, but to keep everything chugging along the way it has it's what we're stuck doing until some dramatic changes are made. Game on the other hand leaves a lot of waste, it's not something we rely on and I consider hunting to be more humane than farming. I still consider cooking pheasants to be of more use than ****ing pheasants.
but eating cows is still one of the primary reasons they are killed. there is an entire industry centered around raising cows to be butchered for food. and eating is more necessary that ****ing yet eating meat is not at all necessary. it's a matter of taste. people like steak and burgers so they kill cows to eat them. so explain to me again why that is important enough to disregard their rights but some pervert's sexual lust is not.
John Wilkes Booth is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 10:43 AM   #10 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wilkes Booth View Post
but eating cows is still one of the primary reasons they are killed. there is an entire industry centered around raising cows to be butchered for food. and eating is more necessary that ****ing yet eating meat is not at all necessary. it's a matter of taste. people like steak and burgers so they kill cows to eat them. so explain to me again why that is important enough to disregard their rights but some pervert's sexual lust is not.
It is, and it's thanks to that that many products can be made affordable. Our realiance on cows for products other than meat is a byproduct of our diet, but that doesn't make it any less of a reliance. That entire industry built on butchering cows began as a necessity, before globalisation people didn't have the choices we do now.
skyline is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.