Saudi Arabia would be a wise country to ban immigration from because they legit sponsor terrorism. Americans haven't had many problems (or even that many immigrants) from the six countries that he banned so it just looks like more dickswinging to me.

Not generally, but false flag operations are a thing, and 9/11 is sketchy AF. It's been over 10 years since I was really into it so my brains a little fuzzy, but let's just say the some very powerful people had a hell of a lot to gain and I wouldn't put it past them to trade a few thousand lives to make a ton of money, power, and resources.

The motives are there for people to connect the dots but the evidence runs with the official story.

The only thing that can stop a terrorist organization with a refugee is a government with a refugee.

I'm not making a claim for one side or the other, and I'm not derailing this thread to discuss it, but lol at official story.. more like alternative facts. Bottom line is idk and neither do you, and while you choose to accept the official story I am not 100% convinced and will remain skeptical. It doesn't have any affect on how I go about things, my view on the government, etc.. it's just something I question the validity of.

I think a lot of the alternative facts come from the half truths of the conspiracy theorists. So much of the skepticism is built on evidence that has been proven again and again to be misleading or untrue. You ever read the popular mechanics book or issue about 9/11 conspiracies?

I don't need to read those books.. My skepticism is not based around what brought the towers down.. It's based around the fact that history has shown false flag operations have happened and there were people in power who stood to make a lot of money, power, and resources following 9/11.. and I wouldn't put it past those pieces of shit to kill a few thousand Americans for their own benefit.

The towers came down, we got to go to war... That was great for a lot of 0.1%s.

Isn't that just conjecture?

Yes.. at what point did I say I knew anything or had evidence to back my "claim"? I simply remain skeptical of the official story. No one has complete information...

So your skepticism is invalid is what you're getting at? The only thing that things like operation northwoods are evidence of is themselves. The only bone I can throw your way is that the FBI did receive a call about the attack and ignored it.

Also, the "fishiness" is likely because of how completely unprecedented it was. How do you know exactly how it would go down if this kind of thing has never happened before? You should really give the popular mechanics debunk factory though because it's scientific and ****: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Popular Mechanics