I'm a bit with DWV on this. The towers were brought down by the planes, no doubt. But the events leading up to the 9/11 are just a bit sketchy. Is it coincidence that the plane that crashed into the Pentagon did so into a section that was under renovation, and as a result, there were not a lot of people working in that area at the time? Still haven't come to grips with this:

http://members.shaw.ca/freedomsix/pi...gon_9_7_01.jpg

Why can't it be a coincidence?

It if that wasn't just a coincidence, it would mean that they they hired some of the greatest pilots in the world to fly into a small part of a building at full speed.

No the fishiness is because of what a few very powerful people and America had to gain by starting a war on terror.

People who could stand to gain more insurance money from property damage than their business was making are responsible for Hurricane Katrina. It's just TOO convenient for them.

It was the perfect in, but that hardly means that our government orchestrated it.

When the government can control hurricanes that might be a legit point. Next..

That's not fishy. "Fishy" means "suspicious" and unless you found any actual evidence that would cast any actual suspicion on anyone then you're just engaging in paranoid conspiracy theorizing.

In the context of the evidence for both sides, it's as legit as yours.

I'm not paranoid, distrust =/= paranoia.. I really don't care, I'm just not gonna swallow the official story like you guys. This is obviously going no where, nothing you can say beyond providing undeniable evidence is going to change my mind, and since there is none we are at a stand still.

Confirmation bias much? Do some research man you're coming off as intellectually lazy. I repeat: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Popular Mechanics