He was elected based on the policies he put forward. He looks to be going through with said policies. That's how it should work.
|
don't get too excited about Canada, Kevin O'Leary seems set on becoming our next Donald... he's currently running to head the conservative party.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's funny how people on the right and Trump supporters are all about the constitution but when freedom of religion is concerned that doesn't matter. It only matters if you are Christian.
|
How has he banned freedom of religion?
|
He hasn't. The travel bans are basically religious tests. When you ban people from coming in from Muslim majority countries that infringes on freedom of religion especially the people that already went through the proper channels to get US Visas.
|
Quote:
Yes, hidden deceptions are very worrying, of course, but they do indicate that politicians feel there's some accountability to the public. There's a limit to what they can get away with, hence the need to hide things. Some of Trump's announcements remind me of things from Soviet era totalitarianism - that there is no need for the official version to reflect the facts, that factual debate is irrelevant. |
Quote:
Trump is a typical populist strongman, for better or for worse depending on a multitude of POVs. He acts the way he does because he has no political experience though, as opposed to having an agenda based on hatred. He's going to be an interesting case study four years from now, especially if he decides not to run for re-election. On another note, seeing CNN and similar news outlets post an upside down statue of liberty was pretty over the top, so I thought I'd share this for something resembling a more balanced perspective on what's happening. The National Review - Donald Trump's "Muslim Ban" - Seperating Fact From Hysteria |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:shycouch: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What qualifies as contextualization seems to depend on the confirmation bias of whoever is reading.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm with DJ on this one. It's pretty clear Trump is not trying to stop immigration per se, at least not yet; he's trying to stop what he sees as a specific religious group or one affiliated with (or believed to be affiliated with) one which promotes terrorism. It's clearly whatever religious profiling would be called - faith profiling? Anyway, it has nothing to do with Italy, France, Germany or Spain (though the last is a historically Muslim country)... it's about what he sees as stopping the spread of "Muslim/Islamist refugees (read, terrorists)" into America and thus keeping her safer.
|
Quote:
|
There's certainly a strong xenophobic element to the fear of islamic terrorism in the US.
Especially since to me the threat of right-wing christian terrorism seems far bigger. Still I can't find too much fault in a president not wanting risky immigration from unstable regions. |
Hey guys remember when Obama did a ban on the same countries plus more for a longer period of time and no one gave a ****? Good times!
MORE HYPOCRISY: Obama Banned all Iraqi Refugees for 6 Months in 2011 - Liberals SAID NOTHING! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
they're pants*
|
Quote:
There has been pretty of division you are right. That comes from the fact that the mainstream media was telling everyone in the states that he wasn't going to win through false polls. People are shocked and upset right now and destroying there own towns for no reason. These protests are a joke and will accomplish nothing. People need to wake up and accept reality. |
I never said anything about opening the borders. A vetting process is fine because the reality IS that these countries have sh*t going on in them that is serious business but a flat out denial of entry no matter who you are, even for three months, is just wrong to me. Maybe I'm just mad that Asghar Farhadi can't come pick up his inevitable Oscar.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
There's people who are shocked. CNN, FOX, MSNBC, New York Times predicted Clinton all to win and a lot of people stayed at home on 8th confident that there would be a Madame President in the morning.
Also doesn't help that people believed that the next Hitler was put into office by all the insane journalism throughout this election cycle. There was literal people taking dumps in the pants at JFK airport you guys. Pretty funny. |
People also being secretive and ashamed of voting from Trump as skewed the election predictions. A lot of people just didn't come out and say they were voting for either candidate due to the label that would have most likely been plastered on them. This election was a unique monster. People were being defined and in some cases assaulted and attacked for who they supported. I'm not surprised they kept that sh*t secret. It's hard to predict an election when a good portion of voters were keeping their mouths shut.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
First off that's an extraordinary claim so let's see some stats. Second, you're talking in specifics, I'm talking in general, sometimes it is necessary for the welfare of a country, which is full and barely able to support it's own people, to not accept more people..
It's analogous to overfilled foster homes. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 PM. |
© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.