So did you miss the part about crime in there or did you ignore it because it contradicted your point? It's a legally based decision. Congress makes the laws. Obviously there are ways for that relationship to be abused, but come on dude, it absolutely is a matter of legality. I'm done moving forward with this stupid ass disagreement. If you're not, out your thoughts on a ledger somewhere and just take my word that you're wrong.

Legal definition of sex

Based on the first sentence, blow jobs count.

Reading comprehension is again failing you.

The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States" who may be impeached and removed only for "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors". Several commentators have suggested that Congress alone may decide for itself what constitutes a "high crime or misdemeanor", especially since Nixon v. United States stated that the Supreme Court did not have the authority to determine whether the Senate properly "tried" a defendant. In 1970, then-House Minority Leader Gerald R. Ford defined the criterion as he saw it: "An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history."

Stop being a dullard just to argue with me.

Well that's also true. However I don't see what the chances are that it'll make such a big impact. I imagine that in the next election, people are legitimately going to be so fed up with the process that they won't even bother voting. That's at least where I would be if that were the case. However I know that's a double edged sword because if you don't vote, you're basically voting for the person that doesn't deserve it. The election process does need a rework, but in the way that it's good for everybody. I don't see that ever happening but if the turnout for voting starts to become less and less, this country is going to have to start really thinking about how seriously they take the election process. I hope I'm making sense here.

Now you're just being ridiculous for ridiculous sake.

Are you even reading the quotes you're posting? Because you keep unintentionally backing up my point.

Chula, I'm actually on Frown's side this time. I read your post and thought "did you miss the part about crime?" Considering crime is pretty much directly related to law.

Frowny

Get back to us after life has been beating your ass for 30 more years. A couple runs of bad luck... just that you respond with that **** tells me haven't seen how ****ing hard it gets.

So when I get to that point, will I start thinking that seeing a therapist, eating healthy, and excercising are bad ideas?

Jeez.

And stop poking fun at my reality you *******s. Really a pretty dickish thing to do.