![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Very likely our national politics would move somewhat to the left, as a reflection of our actual population. But most likely the rural/urban split would remain. Except in this case the Republicans or their replacements would be competing not just for red or purple states but red or purple populations... Including many people living in blue states currently ignored by Republicans in the national elections. And the same would be true for Democrats in red states. I fail to see how this isn't an improvement. |
Quote:
Honestly I don’t even care but that’s the point. |
Quote:
|
Also there's severe irony in the talking point "NY and Cali would determine every election"when that's what currently happens except it's with completely ****ed states like Florida and Michigan and Ohio.
|
The only upshot to the popular vote is that it would force people to restructure in more major urban areas. Which is better for both society and the economy.
I'm tired of politicians throwing on a barn jacket, standing in front of a shut-down factory in Akron, and talking about bringing jobs back. The problem isn't policies. The problem is major factories only work in the suburbs if the rest of the globe is too nuked to function. |
Quote:
Good post. |
Quote:
|
Would you support an amendment that said that everybody has to run as an independent?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:13 PM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.