Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   General Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/)
-   -   Unpopular Music Opinions (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/19170-unpopular-music-opinions.html)

sleepy jack 05-10-2008 11:35 PM

Dude just let it go. Godsmack sucks and the Beatles don't. Now go cry to more of your nu-metal.

sweet_nothing 05-10-2008 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepy jack fire drill (Post 478763)
Dude just let it go. Godsmack sucks and the Beatles don't. Now go cry to more of your nu-metal.

yeh dude srsly shut up, you just aren't going to win this

Oomph! 05-10-2008 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo (Post 478759)
McCartney dosen't do bass solos. That dosen't have anything to do with technical abillity. Its about taste. Bass solos don't suit his music so no bass solos.

And judging how good a f*cking bass player is by weither or not he does solos is just laughable. Do you even f*cking know what a bassist is supposed to do?

Many of the most technically skilled bass gods rarely or never solo. Because soloing doesn't make a great bass player, its about rhythm, balance, solid and creative basslines, complimenting the other instruments and adapting to different styles. Paul had all that covered. Just because someone can do a sloppy ass Victor Wooten impersonation dosen't make him better.

I'm not saying it's *because* he did a solo, in that video he demonstrated that he has more skill tha Paul, that's all.

Also, Godsmack's bass player, Robbie Merrill, has rythm, balance and can play at least a couple of different styles, just that I'm aware of (Heavy Metal, hard rock, slap bass)

What can Paul play that Robbie cannot? inb4 wise ass remark like 'good' or whatever little unoriginal, unfunny BS you will probably reply with.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sleepy jack fire drill (Post 478763)
Godsmack sucks and the Beatles don't.

You latch to that notion blindly but you're wrong. You can childishly repeat that over and over again but it won't magically become true, you're in denial that you like lame pop bands that wouldn't impress a 10 year old and I listen to music that actually invokes emotion and pasison. You have no counter-argument, the Beatles suck, They are both lame and have less talent, I have to go to get up for work in about 4 hours so I'll talk to you guys tomorrow sometime (you'll be here right? You never aren't it seems)

Seltzer 05-10-2008 11:43 PM

You haven't replied to my last 2 posts. And here's another Beatles bassline which ****s over Godsmack's bassist.


sleepy jack 05-10-2008 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oomph! (Post 478768)
You latch to that notion blindly but you're wrong. You can childishly repeat that over and over again but it won't magically become true, you're in denial that you like lame pop bands that wouldn't impress a 10 year old and I listen to music that actually invokes emotion and pasison. You have no counter-argument, the Beatles suck, They are both lame and have less talent, I have to go to get up for work in about 4 hours so I'll talk to you guys tomorrow sometime (you'll be here right? You never aren't it seems)

Passion* still can't spell I see.

Miltamec Soundsquinaez 05-10-2008 11:50 PM

In defense of Oomph, I don't think there's any official doctrine you can lay out to scientifically prove one band's better than another.
Sleepy Jack, Urban, and Rainerd just constantly use their knowledge of language and musical production to seemingly outwit the other person.
Eh, for one reason or another I enjoy the banter.
You guys should host a talk show, or something.............
you make running in circles entertaining

boo boo 05-10-2008 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oomph! (Post 478765)
I'm not saying it's *because* he did a solo, in that video he demonstrated that he has more skill tha Paul, that's all.

Only he didn't, that sounded like something being played by a kid who just learned how to slap. Anyone who knows the technique could play what he plays. Listen to that and then compare it to work by Victor Wooten, Bootsy Collins, Larry Graham, Stanley Gordon, Louis Johnson, Flea and Les Claypool (when they're not even soloing) and you will realise just how mediocre it is in comparison.

Quote:

Also, Godsmack's bass player, Robbie Merrill, has rythm, balance and can play at least a couple of different styles, just that I'm aware of (Heavy Metal, hard rock, slap bass)
Just having rhythm is not enough. Thats required of any bass player. Show me one good bassline that in terms of melody and creativity is better than anything by Paul Mccartney.

Quote:

What can Paul play that Robbie cannot?
For a good band for starters.

ProggyMan 05-11-2008 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheUsed2lguy (Post 478772)
In defense of Oomph, I don't think there's any official doctrine you can lay out to scientifically prove one band's better than another.ng

He's the one trying to do that.

boo boo 05-11-2008 12:14 AM

You know no one has even mentioned the band this guy is named after.

What a sh*tpile of suck.

Urban Hat€monger ? 05-11-2008 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheUsed2lguy (Post 478772)
In defense of Oomph, I don't think there's any official doctrine you can lay out to scientifically prove one band's better than another.
Sleepy Jack, Urban, and Rainerd just constantly use their knowledge of language and musical production to seemingly outwit the other person.
Eh, for one reason or another I enjoy the banter.
You guys should host a talk show, or something.............
you make running in circles entertaining

All i've asked him to do (about 7 times now ) is give a straight answer to some examples of bands Godsmack have influenced and ask him to show how they've changed music , which shouldn't be too difficult when he's saying they're better than the most influential band of the 20th century.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.