RATM being better than Happ With What You Have To Be Happy...

i'd say both are ultimately dissapointing

I never mentioned popularity once. You are claiming they are better than the most influential band of the 20th century , i'm asking you to explain how this is so.

Come on now i've only asked you this 8 times now and you've still not answered this.

You have a point there. But they certainly have material that qualifies as such. Especially on their s/t.

Uh.......

They are.

Saying that one novelty song is better than RATMs whole discography is pretty harsh. And in this case incorrect.

I don't like RATM much, so not really.

I'm pretty sure the picture of the pillowfight ended this argument 13 pages ago. Any band having a pillowfight can clearly NOT be lame (and for the record, that's the "unemotional" lame).

I think that as long as someone is honest about what they like, it doesn't really freaking matter what I or anyone else thinks.

But then, where would we be without relentless bitching?

If some people weren't so eager to troll after someone expresses an opinion like for example.

"I like this band"

"That band sucks, its a fact I'm being objective"

Then music banter would be overall a music better environment for music discussion. Granted the ocassional troll does keep it interesting and gives you something to do.

Oomph's trolling is getting boring now. He continually evades the arguments of others (including myself and Urban), and he clearly hasn't heard any Beatles material outside their poppy stuff.

Yah, he didn't respond to my last post, even though he made several responses to others and I called him out on it.