Necromancer

We're both heading in the same direction basically, I just think he puts to much emphasis on image (but that's OK). And he still prefers The Beatles over The Stones which is completely unacceptable.

Unknown Soldier

The Stones had a cooler image but the Beatles were far better musically

Now that thats all been cleared up, lets move on and talk about something else!

Necromancer

Well I'm so..sorry there "Mr Man". I'll just talk to myself from now on..(until the end of the day anyway). What do you think about Chet Atkins vs Randy Rhoads?

BastardofYoung

:yes:

Rumored still that The Smalls may be getting back together soon, for a few reunion shows. I think the only one holding out is probably Corb. But hopefully that will happen. I never got to see them up front, they played in bars before I was 18.. but they used to play at a small bar by my house when i was young, and I would hang out outside and listen to them from behind the stage door.

Probably my second favorite Alberta band, after:

__________________
last.fm

‎"I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people." - Jack Handey.

BigSwede

And there is always somebody who has to defend them.
The world won't go under because everybody doesn't think they are number one.

Unknown Soldier

Chet Atkins mmmmm well urrrrrrrr...........not really my thing!

Randy Rhoads definitely not my cup of tea.

Good to see, that you don`t think the Stones are number one!

Necromancer

The Beatles didn't have the blues/R&B/funk/soul influence to their music like the Stones did. And those are my favorite genres of preference. And without concern of their image which means nothing musically speaking.
The Who, would be a better band to compare with the Beatles, and The Who would win that one as well. They were a major influence on the punk genre for example, more so or just as much as the The Beatles, they experimented with a lot of different genres of music, opera rock, progression, ambient, whatever.. The Beatles did a lot, but not anything that is more significant or musically extraordinary than the music of the Stones/Who.

Urban Hat€monger ?

About time someone else said this here other than me.

Give me the Stones gritty R&B over the Beatles Fisher Price my first psychedelia album crap anyday.

__________________

TockTockTock

Early noise song. I prefer Velvet Underground's "Loop" (which was released in 1966), but this is still pretty amazing if you ask me. Plus, this was inspired by The Beatles listening to AMMMusic... which is a bonus.



Drone/ambient/psychedelic rock song about the Tibetan Book of the Dead in 1966. This was released a year before Parson Sound ever recorded anything, and two years before International Harvester's debut album. It was also released before The Velvet Underground & Nico which exhibited elements of drone and ambiance.

Not really sure why I am defending these guys... I'm not even a huge Beatles fan... Hell, I love The Who.

Captain Ron

justin bieber is better than the stones