Unpopular Music Opinions - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2010, 10:04 PM   #4491 (permalink)
Seemingly Silenced
 
crash_override's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 2,312
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duga View Post
I love the Chili Peppers personally... They are one of the first bands that really sparked my interest in collecting a complete discography. I was obsessed with how different their early stuff was from their later stuff. They also get some respect for having more than one peak. They were pretty popular in the 80s, they were gigantic in the early 90s, and blew up again in the early 00s after seemingly being past their prime. Only Aerosmith has had so many recoveries.
It's all about not being afraid... to take a stand....
__________________
My MB music journal

Quote:
Originally Posted by OBEY
"Never trust your own eyes, believe what you are told".
crash_override is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 02:43 AM   #4492 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duga View Post
I love the Chili Peppers personally... They are one of the first bands that really sparked my interest in collecting a complete discography. I was obsessed with how different their early stuff was from their later stuff. They also get some respect for having more than one peak. They were pretty popular in the 80s, they were gigantic in the early 90s, and blew up again in the early 00s after seemingly being past their prime. Only Aerosmith has had so many recoveries.
I don't really understand why I should respect a band for making multiple "comebacks." All that says to me is they either compromised musical integrity for the sake of being loved by the mainstream, or they never had any to begin with and just churned out crap that was so bad even the masses couldn't get attached to it.

That aside I think you may be a little off on just how many peaks they've had. Go back and look at the dates of their singles and albums. They didn't catch the attention of the mainstream at all until the release of Mother's Milk at the very end of the 80s. I suppose you could argue the album before it had some success, but not much and the point remains it would still be a progression to success from there. After that was Blood Sugar Sex Magik in early nineties, which was an even bigger album for them. So, as you can see there was no real peak-and-dip in success from the 80s to 90s.

If you follow their career after that you don't really see any substantial change either. The following album, One Hot Minute, while not as successful as it's predecessor, still had Aeroplane and My Friends, which was a number one single. Hardly a dip. They then followed that up with Californication (which came out at the very end of the 90s - when you claim they were on one of their supposed 'dips') which had a song that won a Grammy, as well as Californication and Otherside, two huge songs. After that was By the Way, which had two number one singles and then another song that hit the top 10. So unless you consider the period when they didn't release an album as a dip in their popularity, I don't understand where there peak in the early 2000s come from if they never were unpopular in the first place. Then of course, they released their most recent album, Stadium Arcadium, which debuted at the top of the Billboard 200.

The Red Hot Chili Peppers never went away once they got into the mainstream's eyes. One album may have been less popular then the one before it (e.g. One Hot Minute following Blood Sugar Sex Magik) but that's only if you consider having one less chart topping single then the album before it a huge dip in popularity. One could go on to make a different argument, which is that "oh well that's even better that they managed to stay popular" but I don't think popularity has any relation to musical credibility. It's a bad argument if you want to defend the supposed worth of the Red Hot Chili Peppers, or any artist really.

Last edited by sleepy jack; 09-23-2010 at 02:52 AM.
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 08:18 AM   #4493 (permalink)
MB quadrant's JM Vincent
 
duga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,762
Default

^

Well, you put a lot more work into that post then I did. I was just mentioning what impressed me about them. To each his own...I know plenty of people who don't like them. Their albums may have done consistently well, but I was referring more to the feeling everyone had about them during those times. In the 80's, Hillel died...everyone thought they were done. They still managed to release Mother's Milk and then BSSM after that. Then John left and everyone thought they were done. One Hot Minute may have had a couple charters but no one felt it was a true Chili Peppers album with Dave. Then John comes back and Californication hits it big...bringing us to today. Anyway, I wasn't saying you owe them respect because of these things, I was just saying why I respect them.
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph...
duga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 11:06 AM   #4494 (permalink)
FUNky
 
Violent & Funky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 2,482
Default

Flea is an incredible bassist and all of the guitarists they have had are tremendously talented musicians in their own right. I don't know what about that people can't enjoy...
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/ohio0808

sometimes I don't thrill you
sometimes I think I'll kill you
just don't let me fuck up will you
'cause when I need a friend it's still you
Violent & Funky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 11:36 AM   #4495 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: -_-_-_-_~__~-~_-`_`-~_-`-~-~
Posts: 1,276
Default

Skill on your instrument doesn't necessarily equal good music being made from them; I've always found videos of Flea as an individual to be enthralling and whatnot, but when it comes to listening to a full RHCP album, I give up.
clutnuckle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 11:47 AM   #4496 (permalink)
( ̄ー ̄)
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,270
Default

And it's not just Kiedis' voice that I dislike, it's the style of music that they play. Funk rock. Something about is just irritating, instead of enjoyable.
RVCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 11:51 AM   #4497 (permalink)
FUNky
 
Violent & Funky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 2,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clutnuckle View Post
Skill on your instrument doesn't necessarily equal good music being made from them; I've always found videos of Flea as an individual to be enthralling and whatnot, but when it comes to listening to a full RHCP album, I give up.
That's a good point and I agree with you. I'm not like a Dream Theater fan or something; I think most of you realize this about me.

But damn they write some awesome riffs too. Flea has tons of great bass lines and their guitarists were always funky and fairly melody-driven. There isn't much noodling on the guitar in their 80s output...
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/ohio0808

sometimes I don't thrill you
sometimes I think I'll kill you
just don't let me fuck up will you
'cause when I need a friend it's still you
Violent & Funky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 11:52 AM   #4498 (permalink)
FUNky
 
Violent & Funky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 2,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RVCA View Post
And it's not just Kiedis' voice that I dislike, it's the style of music that they play. Funk rock. Something about is just irritating, instead of enjoyable.
What about it? Do you dislike electric bass? Because the lyrics usually suck?
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/ohio0808

sometimes I don't thrill you
sometimes I think I'll kill you
just don't let me fuck up will you
'cause when I need a friend it's still you
Violent & Funky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 11:54 AM   #4499 (permalink)
I Don't Believe in Llamas
 
Wyrd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Southern Part of the United States
Posts: 153
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James View Post
IV is probably Led Zep's 2nd worst album.
Why does this scream "Said it for Shock Value!" to me?
__________________
Sailor Take Warning. You Cannot Hold the Wind.
Wyrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2010, 12:00 PM   #4500 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyrd View Post
Why does this scream "Said it for Shock Value!" to me?
I don't know why. I already explained my reasons so i'm thinking you're just having an off day.
James is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.