The Average Shelf-Life Of A Band - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2010, 02:35 PM   #21 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,711
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bogey_j View Post
Okay, shelf-life is a bad term to describe what I'm talking about. But how many albums does it take before a band or an artist starts to fall off artistically?

IMO, I feel an artist usually says everything they had to say with their first 3 albums. After that the quality of their music starts to drop by either repeating themselves, or experimenting for the sake of experimenting and failing at it. But this doesn't really apply to any band before 1975, because back then the top bands used to put out albums every 6 months, so its hard to say..
IMO Wilco has remained consistently awesome through 7 albums. Ditto Radiohead
midnight rain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2010, 02:36 PM   #22 (permalink)
MB quadrant's JM Vincent
 
duga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,762
Default

ahh how did i not even think of radiohead?

though their "shelf life" is coming up unless they do something totally radical for their next couple albums.
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph...
duga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2010, 02:39 PM   #23 (permalink)
/
 
Rickenbacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Conn
Posts: 1,338
Default

R.E.M. put out five near perfect albums in a row, and continued to sporadically release good to fantastic albums for the next ten years afterwards. Definitely one of the great consistencies in music, if we neglect the disappointing Around the Sun.
Rickenbacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 06:51 PM   #24 (permalink)
carpe musicam
 
Neapolitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Les Barricades Mystérieuses
Posts: 7,710
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rickenbacker View Post
When you say "a Pop" are you referring to Paul McCartney's father James?
yeah!?




Quote:
Originally Posted by Rickenbacker View Post
R.E.M. put out five near perfect albums in a row, and continued to sporadically release good to fantastic albums for the next ten years afterwards. Definitely one of the great consistencies in music, if we neglect the disappointing Around the Sun.
starting with their ep, right?
.5) Chronic Town (EP 1982)
1.) Murmur (1983)
2.) Reckoning (1984)
3.) Fables of the Reconstruction (1985)
4.) Lifes Rich Pageant (1986)

I think REM is a good example of what the OP was talking about bands that sputter out of control after there first couple of albums.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mord View Post
Actually, I like you a lot, Nea. That's why I treat you like ****. It's the MB way.

"it counts in our hearts" ?ºº?
“I have nothing to offer anybody, except my own confusion.” Jack Kerouac.
“If one listens to the wrong kind of music, he will become the wrong kind of person.” Aristotle.
"If you tried to give Rock and Roll another name, you might call it 'Chuck Berry'." John Lennon
"I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous." Keith Richards
Neapolitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 08:25 PM   #25 (permalink)
/
 
Rickenbacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Conn
Posts: 1,338
Default

Can't knock Document either. Easily their most polished and developed album at the time.

But more importantly, R.E.M. is worth mentioning for their ability to make fantastic albums years after their "prime". Look at Automatic for the People, Monster, or the unbelievably underrated New Adventures in Hi-Fi. Very few artists make songs the quality of which is comparable to something like "Leave" or "E-Bow the Letter" 15 years after their debut single.
Rickenbacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 08:27 PM   #26 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rickenbacker View Post
Can't knock Document either. Easily their most polished and developed album at the time.

But more importantly, R.E.M. is worth mentioning for their ability to make fantastic albums years after their "prime". Look at Automatic for the People, Monster, or the unbelievably underrated New Adventures in Hi-Fi. Very few artists make songs the quality of which is comparable to something like "Leave" or "E-Bow the Letter" 15 years after their debut single.
Monster is pretty awful but I agree with you about Automatic for the People, it's one of my favorites by them.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 08:30 PM   #27 (permalink)
/
 
Rickenbacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Conn
Posts: 1,338
Default

I don't think Monster is great, but i like the overall "feel" of it. On the plus side, a couple of the songs were really awesome. Strange Currencies, What's the Frequency Kenneth?, and Circus Envy are some of my favorite latter-day R.E.M. tunes.
Rickenbacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 08:46 PM   #28 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rickenbacker View Post
I don't think Monster is great, but i like the overall "feel" of it. On the plus side, a couple of the songs were really awesome. Strange Currencies, What's the Frequency Kenneth?, and Circus Envy are some of my favorite latter-day R.E.M. tunes.
Meh. To me even the best songs on that album, like "Crush with Eyeliner", are merely mediocre. When it came out it was by far the worst thing they had ever released and it kind of killed my interest in the band overall.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2010, 11:07 PM   #29 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
storymilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
Monster is pretty awful but I agree with you about Automatic for the People, it's one of my favorites by them.
Automatic For The People is my favorite album by them, though it kind of switches between that and Murmur. And I haven't heard New Adventures, In High-Fi, Document, or Accelerate.
storymilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2010, 07:40 AM   #30 (permalink)
/
 
Rickenbacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Conn
Posts: 1,338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storymilo View Post
Automatic For The People is my favorite album by them, though it kind of switches between that and Murmur. And I haven't heard New Adventures, In High-Fi, Document, or Accelerate.
Have you heard Up and Around the Sun? Up is awesome, and the songwriting on Around the Sun is pretty good but it suffers a lot because of the arrangements and boring instrumentation. The live versions of Around the Sun songs are awesome though. They add a much more rough feel to it.



That said, I also think Reveal is perhaps their best since New Adventures. Imitation of Life is one of my favorite songs of the decade.
Rickenbacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.