|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Groupie
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 45
|
@The Anonymous Groupie:
It looks like your only exposure to modern music is what's in the mainstream. How do you expect to make a fair judgement of it when you've only been exposed to a very small fraction of it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 157
|
Really anything written prior to 1964 doesn't deserve the title of modern-day music. Anything before the mid-late 1980s just sounds dull. I know a lot of passion went into stuff in the 70s, but it just doesn't interest me. A lot of the musicians of these "dull" bands come over as very talented, but the melodies they come up with are just meh. That said, I like Joy Division, who released their first album in 1979. Post-punk (not new wave) is the exception.
I find that music got better in the late 1980s with the rise in popularity of bands such as Pixies, Husker Du, Primal Scream, My Bloody Valentine, REM and Dinosaur Jr. This trend continued through the 90s with groups such as Foo Fighters, Smashing Pumpkins, Nirvana, the early Radiohead (Pablo Honey) and Green Day. I also like a lot of early 2000s music such as Interpol, Kaiser Chiefs, Idlewild, Ash, and the first three Coldplay albums. I feel things started to go downhill in 2006. The existing bands either became poppier (Coldplay), less melodic (Kaiser Cheifs and Idlewild) or thrashier/emo-like. Ditto for new bands. The definition of rock and alternative has changed, much to my disliking. Culturally I define myself as being stuck in the year I was born, not my teenage years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
.
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
|
Quote:
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Groupie
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: the hell of I-285
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
I dont know how to explain this.... I'm a country rocker in a working band... firmly rooted in and influenced by older styles of music... but for some reason I really like a lot of EDM. Shpongle, Crystal Method, Chemical Bros, The Books, Tycho, all kinds. I even try to make some of it myself - I suck at it and it makes me laugh when my other musician friends mock EDM by saying its just some idiot in mouse mask pushing buttons on a laptop. Um, no, not so much... its quite involved, if you want to be really good at it. from my experience anyway.... just my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||
|
midnite roles around
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 5,330
|
I think you calling yourself an audiophile is ruled out by the rest of that post. If you really knew music, you'd know that it's not so cut and dry as what's popular is what's good and that's it.
__________________
YW Fam: All MB Music Projects Under One Roof Emo/Pop Punk Journal Techno Journal Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |||
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: The Organized Mind
Posts: 2,044
|
I’ve just stumbled upon this magnificent thread for the first time. I’ve read through the first 15 and the last 15 pages and will certainly be revisiting the thread to explore more of your ideas. Great stuff!
As a listener who loves the Futurists, the Dadaists, Discordian-inspired musics, and the rich and diverse history of electronic sound, from wire recorder musique concrete to the advent of magnetic tape and onward, I am predisposed to prefer music in a socio-cultural and historical context. Music from the first and second centuries is still stirring and awe-inspiring today, so I believe I hold my expectations of music to somewhat of a high standard. All of that said, I see straight away that many who reject contemporary music as a whole do so from the perspective that commercial/pop music is representative of its time. This is the fundamental flaw in such a dismissive stance. Whereas pop reached its peak in the age of MTV and the era of radio, mass media has since dwindled in cultural relevance with the democratization of music technology - both in its production and its consumption. The internet and the age of digital piracy opened listeners up a significantly greater history of recorded sound, both commercial Library of Congress recordings and independent private releases. Accessibility today is immeasurably greater than ever before, creating an environment of better-educated and more discerning listening tastes. At the same time, digital distribution rendered major labels and media conglomerates (the former gatekeepers to the public consciousness) antiquated and irrelevant dinosaurs of a rapidly dying industry. Those living in the present and witnessing the formulaic, one-dimensional, manufactured product that is pop are beholden to the stark contrast of artistic value and non-value between “real” artists and the saccharine charade which desperately permeates all facets of mass media but falls on deaf ears. I think we haven’t seen a John Peel, a Stockhausen, or a Cobain in recent decades because the channels which would have broadcast them as cultural giants have now disseminated into millions of more intricate tributaries of cultural waters. You are no longer bombarded by news of which artist to worship in a post-television-and-radio cord-cut culture, so you’re left to discover great music on your own. There just isn’t the uniform cultural identity with a spokesperson or hero the way their was in the era of rock. But it’s most certainly out there. Go and discover it.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|