|
|||||||
| Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
The Music Guru.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,858
|
Really? It's 7 AM and I've just briefly read through this thread and I noticed the majority of name calling was done by this guy in return, actually. So don't come in here and say that he's not at fault either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||
|
Facilitator
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
|
Quote:
Just listening to Rascal's music doesn't make me feel it is "distinctive" or particulary innovative. I'd probably classify it as mostly "rap" and not think of it as being different in any way from rap I've heard years ago. However, my lack of appreciation for uniqueness in Rascal's music probably reflects that I'm not familiar with all the different trends that have swept through rap music over the years, and so I can't perceive surprising nuances. Wikipedia says of Rascal, "Although his fast style of rapping and his subject matter are nothing more than ordinary in the UK, Dizzee Rascal's diversity nonetheless separates him from other UK rappers. His music is a mixture of UK Garage and hip-hop beats with an extremely broad palette of influences, ranging from metal guitars to drill and bass synth lines, eclectic samples and even Japanese court music. Dizzee's tracks are traditional grime in that the beats are often asymmetrical and make it difficult to dance to his music. Grime is today still considered underground, despite Dizzee's large mainstream exposure." Dizzee Rascal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ^ Based on this, I'd say Rascal wasn't making large innovations in music, but his eclectic, multi-cultural style of music has perhaps broadened minds. It sounds like he is using old ingredients to make a new soup with a slightly different flavor. Most interesting to me is that Wikipedia says, "The chart success of grime-influenced artists like Rascal is heralded as a signal in the way that white Britons are adapting to a new multicultural and plural musical mix in contrast to previous bands." So even if Rascal's music may not be so innovative, his use of diverse musical traditions within his music may reflect that Britons are becoming even more accepting of a variety of backgrounds. This means that perhaps Rascal's music is inspiring a cultural change toward greater appreciation of different cultures, and so his music isn't just resulting in music evolution but some cultural evolution. <-- That impresses me. * * * Quote:
I said to the OP, "I'm sorry about all the name-calling, sarcasm, and mockery, including an accusation of mental illness, that people have used in this thread. I wish a discussion about music, which I think most of us like very much, wouldn't lead to expressions of hostility by so many individuals as misunderstandings and disagreements lead to frustration." I intentionally made my statement general by referring to "people" and "so many individuals" to try to include everyone in this thread who reacted with hostility, because I did see that Pursuingchange used name-calling while trying to defend himself against name-calling. I'm sorry he used name-calling, too. My interpretation of the thread's emotional mood evolution is that it started friendly, and then after some members debated what "evolution" means, Pursuingchange perhaps felt they were trying intentionally to be obtuse. I think this was a misunderstanding, because I've observed that many people are confused about biological evolution, and so the word "evolution" confuses them, too...especially since Pokemon (curse Pokemon!) have completely misguided a whole generation of kids who now think "evolution" means "change that leads to improvement." I think Pursuingchange was then on edge, expecting the worst from people, and so he responded to well-meaning questions and replies by Janszoon with some preemptive hostility. Then, rather than trying to assure Pursuingchange that their replies weren't meant to be combative, the moderators eventually became hostile back. UH upped the level of hostility by saying the OP came across as a "total arse." OP responded angrily, and as other members jumped on him, he defended himself by responding in kind. He got accused of going off topic by a mod (and I'm not sure why). Finally the OP tried to regain a peaceful status so discussion could continue if anyone wanted to discuss the topic. And that's when I entered the discussion to give my 1,332 cents. ![]() ^ This is my perspective on this thread's evolution. I *am* sorry the discussion went the way it did, because I can see the OP wanted genuinely to discuss a topic that interests him. This doesn't mean I condone all of Pursuingchange's replies to people, but I think I understand why he made them. Also, I feel that established members have a greater responsibility to be polite and welcoming to new members, such as by trying to clear up misunderstandings and settle ruffled feathers rather than disturb them more. It's hard to come into a new community, hoping for friendliness, but fearing being jumped on. I felt it would help Pursuingchange to know that he has some people on his side. Also, I felt it would help him to know that sometimes the fur flies here at MB, but then many of us can settle down and continue to discuss a topic maturely. I think the issue of the evolution of music is an interesting one, and it might inspire people to listen around and hear what they are missing in the world of music. If not for this thread, for example, I probably would have never listened to a single Dizzee Rascal song!
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
|
Quote:
I don't know what thread you were reading but I didn't see that at all. I saw someone who already entered the thread with his mind made up and wasn't the slightest bit interested in what anyone else had to say to him. I gave him an example of something he was looking for and he dismissed it twice without even bothering to listen. So much for 'the OP wanted genuinely to discuss a topic that interests him.'
__________________
![]() Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: indoors
Posts: 722
|
He can speak for himself, if he wishes. In my opinion, there's no requirement that somebody start a thread with much of an open mind. It's still potentially interesting what others have to say regardless. This forum would have more activity if name-calling and other unfriendly behaviors were discouraged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
The Sexual Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
|
Quote:
If he had started this thread by calling it 'Music Has Become Stagnant' and made a long tedious post about how there isn't another Eddie Van Halen or Michael Jackson I would have known what his position is right from the start and wouldn't have wasted my time taking his question seriously and giving him a serious answer. It's people who pull stuff like this that wastes everybodys time that is annoying about this place, not one mild insult said out of frustration.
__________________
![]() Urb's RYM Stuff Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
The Music Guru.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beyond the Wall
Posts: 4,858
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Groupie
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Based in London
Posts: 1
|
I don't believe music has stopped evolving, but i do believe that it is recycled however what makes music seem brand now is the artist behind it, and what they bring to the plate as well as their passion.
My company encourages to show the skeleton or the backbone into why people get into art, and possibly it allows their material to have a greater meaning, Let me know if you want to have a look! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Music Addict
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: indoors
Posts: 722
|
If you were a hard-core Republican, wouldn't you be curious to at least hear short answers about your neighbors' political views? Therefore, don't get mad at someone for asking; and remember he never said, Please write a lengthy reply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Out of Place
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: in an abstract house
Posts: 4,111
|
i personally don't think so, if anything music has become overflooded..
there's ALOT (and do mean ALOT) of bands out there, some of them pushing the envelope, some of them just trying to get a hit song.. Just because these bands are not famous or you don't know them doesn't mean they don't exist. Music is always evolving, always moving forward sometimes in a direction we don't like but is still moving forward.. im personally stuck in the 90's grunge era but even so.. i recognise that bands like Deerhoor or Of montreal or even less experimental bands like Arcade fire are still out there doing what they love without compromising their vision. So music is still evolving and Rock is far from dead, you just gonna know where to look. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|