Fake Mainstream S-hit - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-26-2014, 06:16 AM   #1 (permalink)
.
 
grindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: .
Posts: 7,201
Default

Who are those people? How do you even know about them? Why do you care?
__________________
A smell of petroleum prevails throughout.
grindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 08:46 AM   #2 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Rexx Shredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 158
Default

Rexx Shredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 09:41 AM   #3 (permalink)
Groupie
 
kriswright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 33
Default

"Why you gotta be so mean?"

- Taylor Swift
kriswright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 10:28 AM   #4 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 899
Default

Maybe Lady Gaga will release 4 seconds of digital signal overload to compete with Taylor. It will knock Swift out of first place. Katy Perry then will release 10 seconds of amplifier hum but it will flop because it lasted longer than her listeners' attention spans. Foo Fighters will revive their flagging careers with 2 seconds of traffic noise which will be hailed by fans as a brilliant innovation. Billions of dollars will be generated for the labels as a result. And so it goes.

In the 50s, there was the payola scandal. This was where labels paid DJs to play their latest releases. It turns out that just about every DJ in the country with any clout was neck-deep in it, including Dick Clark although he got away with it. Alan Freed didn't and it ruined his career because he wouldn't deny that he had accepted the money. It gave us a lot of rock n roll but also a lot of schlock:


Connie Stevens and Ed Byrnes - "Kookie, Kookie" (Lend Me Your Comb) - YouTube

Once again, payola revealed that the songs that became the hits were already decided beforehand and it was done for money. But , at least, the DJs had some amount of autonomy to play what they wanted. After the payola scandal died away, mass media did away with it by having the stations program every song, every commercial, all the on-air banter, etc. Most of the broadcasts you hear on radio are no longer even live but have been pre-recorded and heavily edited. So, really, nothing changed except to get worse.

At this same time as the payola scandal, there was a TV game show scandal where certain contestants were given answers beforehand so that they would win and keep coming back because it was good for ratings. It was a secret form of reality TV.

So this reality TV culture has really been going on long before there was anything called reality TV. We were born into it, grew up with it, regarded it as a norm, accept it as art and culture. And so it is. The obligatory 15 minutes of fame is now 8 seconds of static. So enjoy it. Be sure and post a review.
Lord Larehip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 10:33 AM   #5 (permalink)
Because I Am, I Can!
 
CoNtrivedNiHilism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,128
Default

I will subscribe to your threads. That way, when I need to laugh. I have your gold nuggets of disillusioned dribble to read.
CoNtrivedNiHilism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 11:09 AM   #6 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

Well I can see where he's coming from. His point being no different than the Milli Vanilli scandal during the mid 80s.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 02:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Necromancer View Post
Well I can see where he's coming from. His point being no different than the Milli Vanilli scandal during the mid 80s.
Actually, it is different to an extant. Yes, Milli Vanilli's label did a bad thing passing these guys off on a bunch of stupid fool "music fans" who shouldn't be listening stinky crap like that in the first place but it's to the point where the morons aren't even being consulted for their input. Just release the song and declare it #1 on the charts and they'll go out and buy it after the fact. It's like the industry is just on auto-pilot and nobody is listening to anything. Just release it under some big star's name and people go buy it no matter what. You couldn't have a Milli Vanilli fiasco now because it wouldn't matter what they sounded like--just release a song under their name, tell everybody that it's #1 and the sheep go out and buy it. It doesn't matter what it is even when they know it's lip-synced. They buy it anyway and defend the "artist" like they do with Rihanna.
Lord Larehip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 04:34 PM   #8 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Larehip View Post
Actually, it is different to an extant. Yes, Milli Vanilli's label did a bad thing passing these guys off on a bunch of stupid fool "music fans" who shouldn't be listening stinky crap like that in the first place but it's to the point where the morons aren't even being consulted for their input. Just release the song and declare it #1 on the charts and they'll go out and buy it after the fact. It's like the industry is just on auto-pilot and nobody is listening to anything. Just release it under some big star's name and people go buy it no matter what. You couldn't have a Milli Vanilli fiasco now because it wouldn't matter what they sounded like--just release a song under their name, tell everybody that it's #1 and the sheep go out and buy it. It doesn't matter what it is even when they know it's lip-synced. They buy it anyway and defend the "artist" like they do with Rihanna.


Did you even read the article that you linked to?
It's nothing of the sort.
Do you even know how the charts work since it was changed to include downloads?

keep on spouting this crap, it's hilarious.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 11:24 AM   #9 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,626
Default

What exactly is scandalous about an I-tunes glitch?

This thread looks like a bunch of old men in a pub moaning about things they don't really understand.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2014, 11:51 AM   #10 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hat€monger ? View Post
This thread looks like a bunch of old men in a pub moaning about things they don't really understand.
Anybody calls me grandpa, I'll kill you where you stand.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.