Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   General Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/)
-   -   Controversial opinion on music? (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/80808-controversial-opinion-music.html)

tray 02-05-2015 06:14 PM

Controversial opinion on music?
 
Basically my opinion on music is this: adult music if accompanied by dancing especially, is lame, embarrassing, cringe-worthy and simply not cool, I mean they're adults. It doesn't look right or cool in any way acting like a kid onstage when you're not a kid, it's pretty much what immaturity is. Imagine being a father or mother on top of being a singer/dancer?

"Hey kid, where's your dad/mom?"
"Skipping around the stage half-dressed and waving their booty".

It clearly isn't right, I have never taken to older artists and never will. Young cute singers/dancers, sure. If they're below 18 they can be like that but not a responsible adult. It's not exciting, just embarrassing.

Discuss :D

Zyrada 02-05-2015 06:22 PM

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure this is an opinion on dancing, not music.

Also, I find it a little bizarre that you apparently think it's more acceptable for minors (by American legal standards at least) to sexualize themselves on stage than adults.

Chula Vista 02-05-2015 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tray (Post 1547856)
But when an adult does it, it's only for sexual purposes otherwise there is no reason to do it. In fact, they go beyond dressing inappropriately and they mimic sexual acts like grinding etc. The whole thing is just purely sexual.

Good lord.

Aren't you a bit too young to be yelling at clouds?

Mondo Bungle 02-05-2015 09:15 PM

Adults make the best music though

Overcast 02-05-2015 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tray (Post 1547856)
I am against all forms of sexualization.

Well, there's your problem.

I don't see the problem with an adult dancing or expressing themselves in a sexual nature to music or in any appropriate context. Do you hate fun or something?

Quote:

Originally Posted by tray (Post 1547856)
when an adult does it, it's only for sexual purposes otherwise there is no reason to do it.

No, stop dancing! Bad adult, bad! Stop doing natural things in your natural habitat like some kind of disgusting human being.

Zyrada 02-05-2015 09:26 PM

I feel like the only ingredients missing from these posts are "that rap music" and "the youths." Then we'd have the complete portrait of Turn of the Millennium moral panic.

Urban Hat€monger ? 02-05-2015 09:28 PM



Yeah, this is a new opinion.

grtwhtgrvty 02-05-2015 09:45 PM

I don't even have words for that opinion.

My controversial opinion... I believe that music and art in general should always always always be innovative and progressive. If you aren't innovative, in my opinion... I wouldn't say that you SHOULDN'T be making music, but I do see it as completely pointless and less valuable as music as opposed to something that is innovative. I feel like if an artist isn't constantly striving to push the boundaries, they have failed as an artist.

Anything that is derivative is a waste of time to me. Mainstream pop is a waste of time. Bands like Artic Monkeys -- waste of time. iamamiwhoami's new album was a complete waste of time to me, like a complete and utter disappointment that had absolutely no reason to even be made.

I also deem derivative music like Lady Gaga or Katy Perry to generally (not all the time) be listened to people who are less intelligent than me, at least on an artistic standpoint. I know someone who straight up cried to Donatella by Lady Gaga. The only way that I have been able to justify people being engaged by mainstream pop and other hyper derivative genres of music is that they aren't artistically intelligent.

There are a couple of Madonna songs that I can enjoy and I can enjoy dance music but when someone's entire musical spectrum revolves around that type of music I sort of have a tendency to instinctively deem them as lesser in that regard.

Also -- anyone who walks around wearing only one earbud is an ******* who is missing half the song and obviously doesn't care about the quality of the music they are listening to.

Mondo Bungle 02-05-2015 09:47 PM

All music is just ripping off other music, why don't we stop making music ever

grtwhtgrvty 02-05-2015 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mondo Bungle (Post 1547914)
All music is just ripping off other music, why don't we stop making music ever

That's not true though.

Mondo Bungle 02-05-2015 09:54 PM

Everyone making music is just ripping off the first person to make music and Paul McCartney is ripping off Nickelback

grtwhtgrvty 02-05-2015 09:55 PM

Is Paul McCartney actually ripping off Nickelback cause I haven't listened to anything he's made recently

Can you imagine

grindy 02-05-2015 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mondo Bungle (Post 1547914)
All music is just ripping off other music, why don't we stop making music ever

That would be just ripping off 4'33''.

grtwhtgrvty 02-05-2015 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1547919)
That would be just ripping off 4'33''.

I actually think 4'33 is a really cool commentary on music. Idk if that's controversial around here.

Mondo Bungle 02-05-2015 09:59 PM

In this life, you can't win, sure you can try, but you're just gonna lose, BIG TIME.

- School of Rock

Zyrada 02-05-2015 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1547916)
That's not true though.

... but it absolutely is true. To say something is derivative is a totally meaningless criticism in and of itself because all music/art comes from something else in some form. Jazz musicians even unabashedly steal from other jazz musicians as a core part of the culture.

Overcast 02-05-2015 10:01 PM

I like how the thread shifted completely in only a few posts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1547920)
I actually think 4'33 is a really cool commentary on music. Idk if that's controversial around here.

There was a huge debate about it here:

http://www.musicbanter.com/general-m...-what-not.html

grtwhtgrvty 02-05-2015 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zyrada (Post 1547922)
... but it absolutely is true. To say something is derivative is a totally meaningless criticism in and of itself because all music/art comes from something else in some form. Jazz musicians even unabashedly steal from other jazz musicians as a core part of the culture.

This is turning into a vocabulary lesson real quick. Obviously everything is inspired by something and nothing is completely and utterly 110% unique but the term 'derivative' doesn't mean "inspired by", it means 'imitative of".

Like Bjork's 'Debut' was really the birth of dance-pop but Bjork's 'Debut' isn't derivative of dance music.

Death Grips incorporates industrial sounds into their music but Death Grips isn't derivative of industrial music.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Overcast
There was a huge debate about it here:

I think it made a lot of people realize how powerful silence can be in music, and how the absence of sound can, in of itself, be an element in the music.

Frownland 02-05-2015 10:18 PM

Death Grips is pretty derivative of this though



This too


grtwhtgrvty 02-05-2015 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1547929)
Death Grips is pretty derivative of this though



This too


I don't think that even remotely resembles Death Grips.

Honestly when I listen to that I'm not really reminded of Death Grips - I'm reminded of Limp Bizkit lol.

@ The first one

I always sort of saw Blackie more along the lines of Hardcore Punk disguised as hip hop.

Frownland 02-05-2015 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1547930)
I don't think that even remotely resembles Death Grips.

Honestly when I listen to that I'm not really reminded of Death Grips - I'm reminded of Limp Bizkit lol.

@ The first one

You mean it's derivative of something without sounding exactly like it?

Well how about that.

grtwhtgrvty 02-05-2015 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1547931)
You mean it's derivative of something without sounding exactly like it?

Well how about that.

But the TERM derivative, in the art world, based on the dictionary, means "imitative of something", not "Inspired by".

Frownland 02-05-2015 10:27 PM

Or derived from it, which can be written down to influences. That's not to say that things that are similar to another artist are inherently bad. Would you rather live in the first mansion ever built or the best mansion ever built years later?

Here's the dictionary definition of derive, the word that derivative is derived from: base a concept on a logical extension or modification of (another concept).

grtwhtgrvty 02-05-2015 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1547934)
Or derived from it, which can be written down to influences. That's not to say that things that are similar to another artist are inherently bad. Would you rather live in the first mansion ever built or the best mansion ever built years later?

I'd rather live in the best mansion because I don't give a **** if a mansion is derivative. I don't think analogy really follows through.

Frownland 02-05-2015 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1547935)
I'd rather live in the best mansion because I don't give a **** if a mansion is derivative. I don't think analogy really follows through.

So to bring it back to music, if an artist makes the first album with one idea, and another one perfects it and makes the greatest example of that idea, have they "failed as an artist"?

grtwhtgrvty 02-05-2015 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1547936)
So to bring it back to music, if an artist makes the first album with one idea, and another one perfects it and makes the greatest example of that idea, have they "failed as an artist"?

Well I can't really answer that because "the greatest example" is highly subjective. To me, the greatest example of good music is something that is innovative and unique. I mean, I've never met a single artist that enjoys being compared to other artists personally.

Mondo Bungle 02-05-2015 10:40 PM

If someone compared mt music to Whitehouse I'd be like "Damn man, really? Hell yeah, just made my day, Whitehouse rules".

And someone has.

Thanks, Machine.

grtwhtgrvty 02-05-2015 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mondo Bungle (Post 1547939)
If someone compared mt music to Whitehouse I'd be like "Damn man, really? Hell yeah, just made my day, Whitehouse rules".

And someone has.

Thanks, Machine.

Wouldn't you rather hear "Damn I've never heard anything like this. This is so original."

Frownland 02-05-2015 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grtwhtgrvty (Post 1547937)
Well I can't really answer that because "the greatest example" is highly subjective. To me, the greatest example of good music is something that is innovative and unique. I mean, I've never met a single artist that enjoys being compared to other artists personally.

Obviously it would be in your opinion, please don't sidestep the question. Say that the introduction of the idea is poorly done and doesn't seem thought out whathaveyou and then a second artist comes along, takes that idea, and makes an album that really speaks to you, what would you make of the situation then?

And what about albums that you think are incredibly innovative but are actually imitations of works that you hadn't heard before? Would you stop listening to what you once enjoyed and considered innovative because it no longer meets your standard?

Mondo Bungle 02-05-2015 10:46 PM

I listen to TOBC - Heart of Darkness pretty much for the sole purpose that it sounds exactly like Burzum's Hvis Lyset tar oss and Filosofem put together.

Derivative music is great. If it's derivative of music that I love, then it's just more music that I love. At least they're writing different songs amirite

Mondo Bungle 02-05-2015 10:48 PM

And I already made the harshest noise song ever, anyone else who tries to make harsh noise anymore will just be ripping me off. Posers.

It's totally original

Frownland 02-05-2015 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mondo Bungle (Post 1547945)
And I already made the harshest noise song ever, anyone else who tries to make harsh noise anymore will just be ripping me off. Posers.

It's totally original

Bruh, if you're trying to make harsh noise you're ripping ME off. We both know that this is harsher than anything you've done.

Mondo Bungle 02-05-2015 10:55 PM

They don't call it MAXIMUMANNIHILATION for nothing.

On a side not I love that song of yours, one of my favorites

grindy 02-05-2015 10:56 PM

Pfff. Amateurs.
I've played harsher music fingerpicking an acoustic guitar.

Frownland 02-05-2015 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1547949)
Pfff. Amateurs.
I've played harsher music fingerpicking an acoustic guitar.

I bet you've never played harsh noise on three guitars at once with a broomstick.

I win.

Mondo Bungle 02-05-2015 10:58 PM

All I need is a bag of pinto beans

grindy 02-05-2015 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1547950)
I bet you've never played harsh noise on three guitars at once with a broomstick.

I win.

I played two basses with a porcupine though.

Frownland 02-05-2015 10:59 PM

Kinda not kidding about the broom handles though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mondo Bungle (Post 1547951)
All I need is a bag of pinto beans

Cuz your music so shitty?

Ooooooooohhhhhhhh

Mondo Bungle 02-05-2015 11:01 PM

Nah my pinto bean song rocks.

And the original Trouble Salad tape has me playing drums with a bicycle... my friend didn't like me ruining his drums though.

grindy 02-05-2015 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1547953)
Kinda not kidding about the broom handles though.



Cuz your music so shitty?

Ooooooooohhhhhhhh

I didn't think for a minute that you were.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:34 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.