Deerhunter (lead singer, indie, favorite bands, cassette, effect)

Brad Stengel · 11-01-2008, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Meph1986

Ooopps....I meant 180 degree....a 360 degree change in opinion wouldn't be much of a change.

Rainard Jalen · 11-02-2008, 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Stengel

Ooopps....I meant 180 degree....a 360 degree change in opinion wouldn't be much of a change.

It would be, if it began like their other stuff, evolved and transmutated into something quite fundamentally different, and then ended back at square one.

~~Farfisa~~ · 02-01-2009, 02:45 AM

You tell me what's going on.

debaserr · 02-01-2009, 03:22 PM

not necessary lol

Alfred · 02-01-2009, 03:26 PM

I came.

EDGE · 02-01-2009, 11:40 PM

One of my favorite bands, for sure.

Dtownknight · 02-03-2009, 09:20 PM

One of mine also, although 'cryptograms' and 'microcastle' are two different types of albums, i like the progress that they've made. It's hard to compare two albums that i really like from a band i really like but I would have to say that 'cryptograms' hit me harder than 'microcastle'. I would check that out first if i was a new listener.

debaserr · 02-03-2009, 09:25 PM

recommending people to listen to cryptograms first is such a bad idea. cryptograms is...difficult.

~~Farfisa~~ · 02-03-2009, 09:31 PM

Agreed, I actually found "Microcastle" more accessible then "Cryptograms".

Dtownknight · 02-04-2009, 09:26 AM

An albums accessibility is all dependent on what the listener finds accessible. Depending on what type of music they enjoy either album could make them a fan or turn them away. Cryptograms may be more experimental album but it's great and it's Deerhunter. The second half of the album sounds more like Microcastle, but the first 7 songs of cryptograms are awesome IMO. Like a little 30 minute musical journey. I find both albums to be great though.

02-01-2009, 03:22 PM	#24 (permalink)
debaserr eat the masters Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,467	not necessary lol __________________ Last.FM

02-01-2009, 03:26 PM	#25 (permalink)
Alfred one big soul Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Canada Posts: 5,096	I came. __________________ LAST.FM / VINYL COLLECTION / RYM

02-03-2009, 09:20 PM	#27 (permalink)
Dtownknight Groupie Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 39	One of mine also, although 'cryptograms' and 'microcastle' are two different types of albums, i like the progress that they've made. It's hard to compare two albums that i really like from a band i really like but I would have to say that 'cryptograms' hit me harder than 'microcastle'. I would check that out first if i was a new listener. __________________ http://www.buzzafied.com

02-03-2009, 09:25 PM	#28 (permalink)
debaserr eat the masters Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,467	recommending people to listen to cryptograms first is such a bad idea. cryptograms is...difficult. __________________ Last.FM

02-04-2009, 09:26 AM	#30 (permalink)
Dtownknight Groupie Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 39	An albums accessibility is all dependent on what the listener finds accessible. Depending on what type of music they enjoy either album could make them a fan or turn them away. Cryptograms may be more experimental album but it's great and it's Deerhunter. The second half of the album sounds more like Microcastle, but the first 7 songs of cryptograms are awesome IMO. Like a little 30 minute musical journey. I find both albums to be great though. __________________ http://www.buzzafied.com

02-01-2009, 02:45 AM	#23 (permalink)
~~Farfisa~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 2,773	You tell me what's going on.

02-01-2009, 11:40 PM	#26 (permalink)
EDGE accidental genius Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 1,161	One of my favorite bands, for sure.

02-03-2009, 09:31 PM	#29 (permalink)
~~Farfisa~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 2,773	Agreed, I actually found "Microcastle" more accessible then "Cryptograms".