pretentious no, but I'm sure some might.

Ignorant, no not at all. Ignorance reflects lack of knowledge on a subject. I am not short of knowledge in terms of my opinions so no it's almost the opposite of ignorant.

I meant arrogant sorry.

The difference between Confidence and Arrogance is results and which side of them you are on.

???

You get it eventually, just read it again and give it time.

In the meantime, let's as you suggested stay on topic...what is the topic by the by?

Your confident and I'm arrogant? :confused:

Not at all, I promise I am not suggesting that. However that would have been a good analysis of our Torah\Kashrut discussion.

I love shellfish!

Very good line.

I think that's a great way to end the topic.

What I said applied, and continues to apply to what you have been saying.
What is the difference between the amount of proof we have that goblins exist, and the amount of proof we have that God exists? There is no difference, they have equal amounts of evidence in favor of them, that being none. So, when you make statements like:

"We cannot disprove nor prove the existance of god, so to argue his existance is pointless"

You must also acknowledge that to keep in line with your own logic, it would only follow that you also believe

"We cannot disprove nor prove the existance of goblins, so to argue their existance is pointless"

Obviously you don't believe that, so why do you apply that logic to God?
You have said that asserting God's non-existance is bold, so therefore, by your logic, asserting the non-existance of Goblins must also be bold, but certainly you do not believe that. Which is why I can say with the same amount of confidence "God does not exist" that I can say "Goblins do not exist".

Certainly you agree that goblins do not exist, but by your own admission it is bold to say God does not exist. Why? God has no more proof in his favor than do Goblins. So you are not in line with the very logic you have presented in this argument in your assertion that Goblins do not exist. Your logic has pinned you into a corner whereby you have to admit that asserting the non-existance of Goblins is bold, which you obviously will not do. That is why your logic doesn't work.