| The Virgin |
06-15-2011 02:53 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by chipper
(Post 1070648)
|
thanks. i didn't know he was mentioning about factory farming.
he only said farming in his post which, at first, i thought was a reference to agriculture farming. now i get it. apologies.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scissorman
(Post 1070408)
when trolling, try to be a little less obvious.
|
why do you always chase me for my attention? i don't have the slightest interest in you scissorman.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tore
(Post 1070734)
Well, yes, but if animals are intended to be et, then any survival instinct they have that would cause them to run away would interfer with their Godly purpose. If animals were intended by God to be et, then their behaviour is poorly designed.
It was not so much a real question as it was pointing out faulty logic. Of course no animal's purpose is to be eaten by a different species of animal.
|
animals are meant to be poorly designed because they are inferior creatures compared to us humans which is made in God's image and likeness.
also, let me correct you that aside from the fact that animals are made for humans, some animals are made or meant to be eaten by those animals that are made for humans. for instance, God made worms to be eaten by chickens, then chickens be eaten by humans. chickens are made for humans. worms are made for chickens.
|