Queen Boo

You can be right or you can eat corpses.
You can't have both.

__________________
https://www.twitch.tv/drrobuttnik

FRED HALE SR.

Tell that to the Uruguayan rugby team that survived a plane crash in the Andes Mountains. They were forced to eat each other. They were right and ate corpses.

Queen Boo

I think that's a little different from choosing to eat a processed, hormone filled corpse over something else but TOUCHE. YOU GOT ME.

__________________
https://www.twitch.tv/drrobuttnik

FRED HALE SR.

Circumstances for everything. Its a wonderful world. And that cucumber salad looks pretty tasty above, would go great with a dead corpse.

The Batlord

You should try it with the barbecued baby(back ribs).

__________________

Mr November

Human beings have evolved high intelligence and therefore an incredibly complex emotional and ethical awareness that I don't know if any other animal on the planet shares.

In my view, humans are conditioned by evolution to consume and digest meat as well as other foods. But because humans have happened upon being very special in our capacity for thought, and the ease at which we can live, I don't think that our nature can be an objective excuse for any behaviour.

I also don't see eating meat as being objectively right or wrong. But it has to be said that human beings have chosen a path of separation from normal food chains and we are constantly trying to separate ourselves from nature. If this is what we want, we can't use our instinct or our nature as a crutch for difficult decisions.

And if you are for removing meat consumption from the equation, or farther still removing dependency on animals for food and materials all together, than you do have to consider how humans have created various creatures in our history, that being domesticated, now depend on us for the survival of their species.

As far as cannibalism: when it comes to survival... you do what you have to. But eating another person would be the option after the last option.

Howard the Duck

a:- making a silly ill-founded assertion
b:- when the other side makes a valid point, start getting edgy and defensive
c:- creating diversionary tactics to other irrelevant points
d:- when cannot answer the valid point, starts getting defensive
e.:- still persists on silly idea, when not accepted at all, act butthurt
f:- bail out when cannot answer
g:- starts making weird assertions that has nothing to do with the silly idea that was started

__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

The Virgin

Howard the Duck

and to answer your question of no case

you asserted a point, you have to prove it

i've struck out your point by showing there's no evidence of your point

now, can you at least stop from being thrown into jail for contempt of court as for making a conjecture without evidence?

which means :- the Judge is still waiting for the Scripture you promised that shows God made animals especially for man to eat and i don't mean "to have dominion over" when man was still in Eden......

__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

The Virgin