A question to vegetarians - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-28-2011, 07:04 PM   #261 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
hip hop bunny hop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,381
Default

Quote:
Finally, what makes you believe that eating meat is the best way to build lean muscle mass? This doesn't mesh with what I've read.
Because of calories. 1 serving of prepared beans is 110 calories and has 8 grams of protein. 1 serving of light tuna is about 60 calories and has 13 grams of protein. An egg has about 7 grams of protein at about 70 calories. Take Cashews as another example; 160 calories and only 5 grams of protein.

Further, as you point out, non-animal sources of protein are incomplete unless coupled with grains. Grains are deceptivelly high in calories; a single slice of whole wheat bread is roughly 100 calories (and contain about 4 grams of protein).

So, you could have: 1 slice of whole wheat bread & one serving of beans, and get 12 grams of protein and 210 calories. Or you can have 1 serving of light tuna, get 13 grams of protein, for 60 calories.

This is why meat is superior for building lean muscle; you can get large amounts of protein while still operating at a caloric deficit. So you can both build muscle and loose weight simultaneously; this is one of the reasons why Keto diets are so effective at rapid weight loss.

Quote:
Would you please read the following Harvard School of Public Health web page on protein, paying special attention to what they say about red meats and processed meats? http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritio...l#introduction
I'm familiar with the arguments; regarding the link to cancer, let's say there was a huge increase in potential for colon cancer, like a 200% increase. Does that make it a significant health risk? No, because the chance for colon cancer is still extremely low. The two biggest factors for determining health are body weight and activity level; paying attention to the latest single study that show Food X has an effect on Cancer Y or how Food G has ____ effect on metabolism....

Regarding eggs & the link between dietary cholesterol and heart disease; this is controversial. As the page you linked to so noted, studies on low-carb diets have produced mixed results, including in regards to heart disease.
__________________
Have mercy on the poor.
hip hop bunny hop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2011, 08:02 PM   #262 (permalink)
snickers
 
Trauma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: detroit
Posts: 2,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dog View Post
hi, would you eat an animal if they died from natural causes? -as opposed to being killed.
This is literally the entire basis for this 3 year old, 27 page thread?
What a JOKE!
__________________
A mi no me importa nada
Para mi la vida es un sueño
Trauma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2011, 10:08 PM   #263 (permalink)
I sleep in your hat
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Melbourne, Vic. Aus.
Posts: 1,846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trauma View Post
This is literally the entire basis for this 3 year old, 27 page thread?
What a JOKE!
Well if you can get 32 pages out of Katy Perry I Kissed a Girl it doesn't take much.
Stephen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2011, 10:13 PM   #264 (permalink)
Make it so
 
Scarlett O'Hara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fazstp View Post
Well if you can get 32 pages out of Katy Perry I Kissed a Girl it doesn't take much.
E-high five.

There are some ridiculous threads and some amazing threads on MB. If anyone wonders why Lady Gaga's thread is so big it's because of people constantly arguing whether shes a) a good singer b) run by a group of money-crazed men c) a facade. Hardly any of it actually discusses the music she produces.
__________________
"Elph is truly an enfant terrible of the forum, bless and curse him" - Marie, Queen of Thots
Scarlett O'Hara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 05:14 AM   #265 (permalink)
Facilitator
 
VEGANGELICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Where people kill 30 million pigs per year
Posts: 2,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop View Post
Because of calories. 1 serving of prepared beans is 110 calories and has 8 grams of protein. 1 serving of light tuna is about 60 calories and has 13 grams of protein. An egg has about 7 grams of protein at about 70 calories. Take Cashews as another example; 160 calories and only 5 grams of protein.

Further, as you point out, non-animal sources of protein are incomplete unless coupled with grains. Grains are deceptivelly high in calories; a single slice of whole wheat bread is roughly 100 calories (and contain about 4 grams of protein).

So, you could have: 1 slice of whole wheat bread & one serving of beans, and get 12 grams of protein and 210 calories. Or you can have 1 serving of light tuna, get 13 grams of protein, for 60 calories.

This is why meat is superior for building lean muscle; you can get large amounts of protein while still operating at a caloric deficit. So you can both build muscle and loose weight simultaneously; this is one of the reasons why Keto diets are so effective at rapid weight loss.
I can see, based on your explanation, why relying on beans and grains rather than tuna or eggs as a protein source may make building lean muscle more difficult.

I read online that an effective diet for putting on lean muscle mass has 40% of calories from protein, 40% of calories from carbohydrates, and 20% of calories from fats (40:40:20). Most plant sources of protein have less than 40% of calories from protein and so could not support such a diet.

Black beans, for example, have 26% of calories from protein, since 1 cup of cooked black beans has 227 calories and 15 g protein (15 x 4 = 60 calories).

A whole wheat bread slice with 50 calories has 4 g protein, which is 32% of the total calories according to this source of data on protein content: Calories in Nature's Own - Nature's Own 100% Whole Wheat | Nutrition Facts and Information.

Tofu is one bean-derived food with high quality protein that has slightly more than 40% of calories from protein (Calorie Counter | Free Online Diet Program | Nutrition Data )...but that is still much lower than tuna's percentage of calories from protein.

So, if someone is wanting to put on lean muscle mass, such a person might have a good argument for eating a fish that has washed up onto shore and thus died of natural causes! (I'm trying to relate our conversation to the original poster's question. )

However, I wonder whether the 40:40:20 rule truly *is* the best ratio of protein:carbohydrates:fat calories to eat to put on lean muscle mass. Do bodybuilders who eat beans and grains for protein actually *have* a harder time putting on lean muscle mass than meat-eating bodybuilders?

Also, note that beans and grains would be better than some meats for building lean muscle mass based on your criterion of the ratio of protein calories to total calories in the food.

For example, a 266 calorie hamburger has 13.3 g protein (13.3 x 4 = 53 calories), or only 20% of calories from protein. A pork sausage has only 23% of calories from protein. Both have a lower percentage of calories from protein than black beans (26% calories from protein) and whole wheat bread (32% calories from protein, according to my source).

So this disproves your claim that "If you want to build lean muscle mass, meat is the way to go." Not all meats provide a higher ratio of protein calories to total calories compared to plant sources of protein.

I agree with you, though, that many meats do out-perform plant sources of protein if one is considering only the percentage of calories from protein.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop View Post
I'm familiar with the arguments; regarding the link to cancer, let's say there was a huge increase in potential for colon cancer, like a 200% increase. Does that make it a significant health risk? No, because the chance for colon cancer is still extremely low. The two biggest factors for determining health are body weight and activity level; paying attention to the latest single study that show Food X has an effect on Cancer Y or how Food G has ____ effect on metabolism....

Regarding eggs & the link between dietary cholesterol and heart disease; this is controversial. As the page you linked to so noted, studies on low-carb diets have produced mixed results, including in regards to heart disease.
I understand your point that it is a personal assessment whether health risks due to foods one eats are big enough to be concerned about them.

As for eggs and the Harvard School of Public Health's recommendation to eat no more than 6 eggs per week to avoid an increase is risks of heart disease, it looks to me as if the evidence for that is getting pretty strong, although studies often have limitations that require researchers to say the results "suggest" rather than prove without a doubt.

I haven't located any studies that found that eating more than an egg per day *helps* heart health, but there appear to be quite a few studies that find it is associated with a non-trivial (in my opinion) increase in the risk of heart problems.

Here's one of the sources Harvard cited, which you can view online in its entirety:

Quote:
Djousse L, Gaziano JM. Egg consumption and risk of heart failure in the Physicians' Health Study. Circulation. 2008; 117:512-6

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of hospitalization and emergency department visits among older adults. Although egg consumption up to 6 times per week was not associated with incident HF, consumption of 1 egg per day was associated with a 28% increased risk of HF, whereas consumption of 2 eggs per day was associated with a 64% increased risk of HF after accounting for confounding factors.

The large sample size, the longer duration of follow-up, and the robustness of our findings in sensitivity analyses are strengths of the present study.

Egg Consumption and Risk of Heart Failure in the Physicians' Health Study -- Djoussé and Gaziano 117 (4): 512 -- Circulation
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neapolitan:
If a chicken was smart enough to be able to speak English and run in a geometric pattern, then I think it should be smart enough to dial 911 (999) before getting the axe, and scream to the operator, "Something must be done! Something must be done!"

Last edited by VEGANGELICA; 06-02-2011 at 05:30 AM.
VEGANGELICA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 05:52 AM   #266 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cebu, Philippines
Posts: 677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord View Post
Alright. Forget about the jellyfish. The Virgin claimed that not eating meat was immoral because the Bible tells you to eat meat. But he is gay so he is going against the Bible. Therefore he claims that vegetarians are immoral for going against the Bible while he is going against the Bible by being gay. This is hypocrisy. Comprende?
what? i never said eating meat was immoral.
The Virgin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 07:23 AM   #267 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Eyrie, Vale of Arryn, Westeros
Posts: 3,234
Default

You said it goes against the bible, apparently.

Sooo make up your ****ing mind
Sansa Stark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 08:28 PM   #268 (permalink)
\/ GOD
 
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nowhere...
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hip hop bunny hop View Post
Further, as you point out, non-animal sources of protein are incomplete unless coupled with grains. Grains are deceptivelly high in calories; a single slice of whole wheat bread is roughly 100 calories (and contain about 4 grams of protein).
Yes, but then... If Hitler was such a luminary, and brilliant man... How did he possible keep in shape, and maintain enough nutrition to operate his godlike cerebrum on a vegetarian diet?

After all, he's the ultimate hippy destroyer.
__________________
Quote:
Terence Hill, as recently confirmed during an interview to an Italian TV talk-show, was offered the role but rejected it because he considered it "too violent". Dustin Hoffman and John Travolta declined the role for the same reason. When Al Pacino was considered for the role of John Rambo, he turned it down when his request that Rambo be more of a madman was rejected.
Al Pacino = God
Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 09:03 PM   #269 (permalink)
Live by the Sword
 
Howard the Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 9,075
Default

do animals even feel pain in the human sense?

that's what I like to know
__________________


Malaise is THE dominant human predilection.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Virgin View Post
what? i don't understand you. farming is for vegetables, not for meat. if ou disagree with a farming practice, you disagree on a vegetable. unless you have a different definition of farming.
Howard the Duck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2011, 11:14 PM   #270 (permalink)
What a guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 2,123
Default

Mammals definitely do
__________________
last.fm
khfreek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.