The Sexual Experience Thread

[YorkeDaddy]

Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR.

I never encounter these problems you guys speak of. And If I did I would do it out of the publics eye, because i'm thoughtful that way. Boxer Briefs are changing the way we live.

Again, try having a penis that's bigger than 3 inches for a change.

[FRED HALE SR.]

Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy

Again, try having a penis that's bigger than 3 inches for a change.

Yeah because Batlord didn't already say that about ten hours ago. Way to be original. I love my small penis.

[Freebase Dali]

I don't think dick length is the problem here. Unless your d*ck is like 7 inches in girth, boxers should have no problem letting your 28 inch d*ck, apparently, accommodate that. Pants, on the other hand, might have an issue with a 28 inch d*ck, seeing as how I don't know of any pants crotches that extend that low if you're not a thug.
I do know of pants that are too tight, and those are the ones that cause adjustment issues, which is one of the reasons I don't wear them, along with general comfort considerations.
If you're walking around with a normal, flaccid penis, a few inches given or taken shouldn't be such an issue provided you're not wearing restrictive clothing or getting all bunched up while sitting.

I don't think the argument based on assumption of someone's d*ck size is any more valid than an assumption that possibly wearing less restrictive clothing could be the real issue. But then again, I didn't think this was a discussion regarding some adolescent need to boast about, and/or insult, the size of d*cks...

[FRED HALE SR.]

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali

I don't think dick length is the problem here. Unless your d*ck is like 7 inches in girth, boxers should have no problem letting your 28 inch d*ck, apparently, accommodate that. Pants, on the other hand, might have an issue with a 28 inch d*ck, seeing as how I don't know of any pants crotches that extend that low if you're not a thug.
I do know of pants that are too tight, and those are the ones that cause adjustment issues, which is one of the reasons I don't wear them, along with general comfort considerations.
If you're walking around with a normal, flaccid penis, a few inches given or taken shouldn't be such an issue provided you're not wearing restrictive clothing or getting all bunched up while sitting.

I don't think the argument based on assumption of someone's d*ck size is any more valid than an assumption that possibly wearing less restrictive clothing could be the real issue. But then again, I didn't think this was a discussion regarding some adolescent need to boast about, and/or insult, the size of d*cks...

LOL Hope that job interview went well dawg. LOL

[FETCHER.]

Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle

I would say that men should choose what type of underwear they wear. If they like tight one, no problem but if they want a looser one, then that should be no problem.

gold.

[PoorOldPo]

Originally Posted by Franco Pepe Kalle

I would say that men should choose what type of underwear they wear. If they like tight one, no problem but if they want a looser one, then that should be no problem.

I am very curious about what it is like to have a real-life conversation with you.

[Freebase Dali]

Originally Posted by FRED HALE SR.

LOL Hope that job interview went well dawg. LOL

It's this Thursday. If they don't hire me on the spot, I'll let them interview my d*ck. It will be a long interview.

Kidding.
It would be average.

[YorkeDaddy]

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali

I don't think dick length is the problem here. Unless your d*ck is like 7 inches in girth, boxers should have no problem letting your 28 inch d*ck, apparently, accommodate that. Pants, on the other hand, might have an issue with a 28 inch d*ck, seeing as how I don't know of any pants crotches that extend that low if you're not a thug.
I do know of pants that are too tight, and those are the ones that cause adjustment issues, which is one of the reasons I don't wear them, along with general comfort considerations.
If you're walking around with a normal, flaccid penis, a few inches given or taken shouldn't be such an issue provided you're not wearing restrictive clothing or getting all bunched up while sitting.

I don't think the argument based on assumption of someone's d*ck size is any more valid than an assumption that possibly wearing less restrictive clothing could be the real issue. But then again, I didn't think this was a discussion regarding some adolescent need to boast about, and/or insult, the size of d*cks...

I don't wear pants that are too tight, nor do I wear restrictive clothing at all. As I've said, I wear boxers, and any sort of khaki shorts/pants and jeans bother me, whether baggy or not. I think that size really is the issue. The crotches in any given pair of jeans does not hang that low from waist, anyone of even average size will run into problems every now and then. This is not some boasting contest, it's just the fact that Fred Hale is ignorant and clueless and can't imagine what it might be like to have average sized genitalia.

[Freebase Dali]

Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy

I don't wear pants that are too tight, nor do I wear restrictive clothing at all. As I've said, I wear boxers, and any sort of khaki shorts/pants and jeans bother me, whether baggy or not. I think that size really is the issue. The crotches in any given pair of jeans does not hang that low from waist, anyone of even average size will run into problems every now and then. This is not some boasting contest, it's just the fact that Fred Hale is ignorant and clueless and can't imagine what it might be like to have average sized genitalia.

I know, and I've worn pants with high crotches and it's not conducive to a comfortable package, and short of me going into detail about efficient d*ck positioning, I will say that not all pants are built the same. If you happen to have a pair that's uncomfortable, would it be feasible to let them ride lower than you normally do?

I'm not sure if you wear your pants over your belly button or anything, but I have plenty crotch space in my pants simply by them resting low enough to accommodate. I could fit a litter of kittens in there on a good day. I know a roomy crotch area isn't probably a product of style now days like it was in the '90s, but it's functional.

Either way, communicating this kind of thing doesn't have to come off negatively.

[FRED HALE SR.]

Originally Posted by YorkeDaddy

I don't wear pants that are too tight, nor do I wear restrictive clothing at all. As I've said, I wear boxers, and any sort of khaki shorts/pants and jeans bother me, whether baggy or not. I think that size really is the issue. The crotches in any given pair of jeans does not hang that low from waist, anyone of even average size will run into problems every now and then. This is not some boasting contest, it's just the fact that Fred Hale is ignorant and clueless and can't imagine what it might be like to have average sized genitalia.

Or it could be somebody else is in the closet about their junk, just let it out maybe you'll feel better. Don't worry man when your girlfriend breaks it off shes just gonna tell everyone at IU I mean how many people could that be? Godspeed.