Is Meat Really Murder? - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > Community Center > The Lounge
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-26-2010, 03:03 PM   #10 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VEGANGELICA View Post
One good reason: Your health.

Diets high in saturated fats (prevalent especially in animal products) and high in cholesterol (found only in animal products) increase your risk of heart disease and a variety of cancers. Eating red meats and especially processed red meats is particularly harmful to health; less is better.
The Growing Case Against Red Meat - TIME

Recent studies have found red meat consumption correlates with increased breast cancer risk.
Arch Intern Med -- Red Meat Intake and Risk of Breast Cancer Among Premenopausal Women, November 13, 2006, Cho et al. 166 (20): 2253

Dairy product consumption may be associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer and prostate cancer.
Prospective Study of Diet and Ovarian Cancer -- Kushi et al. 149 (1): 21 -- American Journal of Epidemiology
Dairy products, calcium, and prostate cancer risk in the Physicians' Health Study -- Chan et al. 74 (4): 549 -- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Yawn. Unless you're saying meat is the irrefutable, singular cause for bad health then these points are mute. Everywhere we go we are bombarded with chemicals, whether in public drinking water or the very air we breathe in crowded metropolitan cities. Eating meat in moderation, and in conjunction with an active lifestyle, will not lead to any illnesses or detrimental health effects. Consuming free-range or additive-free meats are even less likely to cause adverse effects that are noticible, whether long term or immediate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VEGANGELICA View Post
Anticipation, the harmful environmental effects of animal agriculture are not hypothetical but occur even now. Two examples: approximately 18% of greenhouse gas emissions are due to the livestock industry; water pollution and lack of potable fresh water in many locations is worsened by agricultural runoff from crops grown primarily for livestock feed (see "Dead Zones" Dead in the Water | Environmental Working Group).
Industrial production of steel, fuels, and especially plastics are exponentially more harmful to the environment, are carried out on almost-as-massive scales, and occur every single day in order to create a myriad things we don't need. If you're really concerned about humanity's impact on the planet you should be attacking giants like DuPont, Exxon, and GE. I suspect that, at best, your environmental sympathies are just a side-effect of your antiquated notions of the inherent value of all life, which you believe should be cherished and protected. At worst they're just another means of convincing others to be guilty about eating animals. Correct me if I'm wrong.
anticipation is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Similar Threads



© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.