It's not terrible, it's just not great. Thoroughly mediocre.

Mostly not very impressed with comic book movies. I'm not disrespecting comic books, but the movies are usually pretty meh. The first X-Men and Days of Future Past stand as the best of a mostly bad bunch in my opinion. I liked Watchmen a lot, but I usually forget to mention it as a good movie since I thought the comic was way better.
I have no relationship with the Suicide Squad source material so I can't really get myself hyped up about it.

Go watch the Marvel Studios movies. They're formulaic, but the formula is on point.

I've seen maybe half to two thirds of them and I've not been all that happy witht he results. The Thor movies sucked the most, but mostly it's just been stuff that I didn't really feel all that strongly about. I've skipped the most recent batch, so there's something to catch up to, I guess.

EDIT: Just noticed you said Marvel STUDIOS specifically. I really don't have any sort of grip on which Marvel related movies are made by what corporate entity.

The Spider-Man movies are made by Sony. The X-Men and Fantastic Four movies are made by Fox (along with the Ben Affleck Daredevil movie). Everything else is Marvel Studios. Iron Man, Thor, Captain America, and the Avengers are all made by Marvel Studios. It's basically all down to Marvel not having their own studio when Spider-Man and X-Men became movie properties, so the rights were optioned out to Sony and Fox. But now that Marvel has their own studio they don't farm out the rights anymore and can do what they want. So long as what they want doesn't include Spider-Man or the X-Men.

I only really have personal ties to the X-men franchise (used to read them as a kid), so I wish they got their hands on the rights again. Bryan Singer did allright though - even if the newest one is supposedly a bit of a mess (haven't seen it).

the new x-men sucked. not enough michael fassbender. too much hairy wolf guy.

As long as X-men keeps pushing out Deadpool, I'll be happy.

when i went to see deadpool with my friend it got so annoying/bad we walked out after like the first 15 minutes.

You don't deserve to live anymore.

When I watched X-Men First Class in the movie theater, everyone laughed when that dude first turned into a blue wolf. I'm not sure they meant for it to look silly, but the crowd has spoken.

The newest one is garbage. It's to the new movies what X3 was to the first trilogy. And they're never going to give X-Men back. Part of all of the movie deals was that the companies with the rights had to make a movie every so many years in order to maintain the rights. That's why that ****ty Fantastic Four movie got released, cause the time was up and Fox had to release SOMETHING or their movie rights to the franchise would revert back to Marvel.

That's why Marvel was able to do the Daredevil TV show, cause Fox's movie bombed so hard that they didn't even care about letting the rights revert. But even if the new X-Men movies suck they're still more profitable than not making any X-Men movies. Same with Sony and Spider-Man.

That's why it was such a big deal that Spider-Man was in the latest Captain America movie. Captain America is a Marvel Studios property, while Spider-Man is a Sony property, and movies companies just don't do that ****. Except for this time. Unfortunately Fox doesn't sound like they're willing to play ball like Sony is. So no Wolverine in the next Avengers.

An American President. One of my all time fave movies. Politics aside, it's a great love story that mixes comedy and drama perfectly. And the powerhouse cast are all great.

My crush on Annette Bening has been rekindled once again.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...f72e8d2fdf.jpg

**** you, muzzie. You don't know **** about **** and should stick to packing ****.

That is a pretty uneccesarily complicated situation.

no you're just a nerd

Like I said, Marvel didn't have their own movie studio back in the day, cause why would they? But now that the money is in superhero movies they have one, but are now in the position of having some of their biggest properties being licensed to different companies.

Says the guy on a music forum.

ooh burn!

i'm only here cuz buttlord <3

Not for me? Ugh!! We're are through romantically. Not sexually.

No one likes a beggar. I treat him like ****, which is why he's jocking me and not you.

jocking?? batbitch stop acting like i'm in love with you

Bitch, you're embarrassing yourself. I'm not gay enough for you.

you're too gay for me.

Says the guy with two guys and flowers in his avatar.

someone's never watched close-up... i chose this avatar because abbas kiarostami passed away recently and i'm sad. **** you.

Damn. It's almost like this place was better when pansy gayboy wasn't around.

is that supposed to hurt my feelings or make me go away or something? cause you're gonna have to try harder...

Well, evidently it won't work, but yes, your assumption is correct.

I'm about 99% positive Isis members target anybody who has a bad thing to say about Deadpool.

Why would he target himself? Suicide bomber?

I cared so little about it that I didn't even watch it.

Hairy wolf guy? I still haven't seen it. But if you mean Beast, Beast's actually part lion.

Four Brothers. Total testosterone flick. Definitely not art house but fun as hell.

Also Beast is ****ing awesome and anyone that thinks otherwise needs to take several stadium seats

why do i need to take several seats? i'm just one person...

A cat-like ape. Or an ape-like cat. He's changed even more in the comics than he was in the shows.

who the **** was talking about beast.... i meant wolverine

But yes the paucity of Fassbender was bull****.

thank you, buttlord. i just learned a new word <3

i googled paucity and it means 'smallness'

can i use this word to describe the paucity of your penis?