Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Rock & Metal (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-metal/)
-   -   The Band w/ the biggest impact (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-metal/13652-band-w-biggest-impact.html)

Expletive Deleted 02-02-2006 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shooting Star
For every Hello, Hello, Hello How Low (there weren't that many anyway) there were more meaningful and better written lyrics. Kurt himself acknowledged his exploitation of writing music for "nonconformist" teenagers. One of the lines from a song of his went "Teenage angst has paid of well, now I'm bored and old...", he was aware of it as anyone and could still craft catchy and interesting pop songs.

The fact that he admitted it doesn't change the fact that it was completely uninspired songwriting.

Expletive Deleted 02-02-2006 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PerFeCTioNThrUSileNCe
but, that would be factually wrong. because i doubt sid vicious could hold a candle to geddy lee. thus that opinion, based on personal preference, is factually wrong.

Did you completely miss what I just said? An opinion can't be wrong. I agreed that saying The Sex Pistols were more skillfull than Rush would wrong, but saying you prefer them isn't. "I like the Sex Pistols more than Rush," and "The Sex Pistols are a better band than Rush," are two different things.

boo boo 02-02-2006 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Expletive Deleted
The fact that he admitted it doesn't change the fact that it was completely uninspired songwriting.

^ Wrong.


In my opinion of course. :pimp:

Muzak Geek 02-02-2006 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger
MB Beatles bias

:wave: I'm biased towards the Beatles - count me in.

boo boo 02-02-2006 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Expletive Deleted
Did you completely miss what I just said? An opinion can't be wrong. I agreed that saying The Sex Pistols were more skillfull than Rush would wrong, but saying you prefer them isn't.

This whole time we werent talking about preference, you have been bashing Nirvana like its a fact, and thats why you are having a hard time with me.

Expletive Deleted 02-02-2006 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo
^ Wrong.


In my opinion of course. :pimp:

Oh yeah? Well in my opinion, you're wrong.

Take that.

Shooting Star 02-02-2006 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Expletive Deleted
Oh yeah? Well in my opinion, you're wrong.

Take that.

Well in my opinion you're wrong and he's right. Two to one. :nono:

Expletive Deleted 02-02-2006 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo
This whole time we werent talking about preference, you have been bashing Nirvana like its a fact, and thats why you are having a hard time with me.

What are you talking about? Where did I say anything like it was fact?

Expletive Deleted 02-02-2006 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shooting Star
Well in my opinion you're wrong and he's right. Two to one. :nono:

Well if we're going by majority rule I guess Britney Spears is talented and Emo is whiny pop-punk?

Shooting Star 02-02-2006 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Expletive Deleted
Well if we're going by majority rule I guess Britney Spears is talented and Emo is whiny pop-punk?

We can either go by elitist drivel, majority rules bolshevism, or the natural down to earth opinion's of the average person. If everyone accepts emo to be pop-punk, and two critics say emo is something else entirely, by so many people having consensus as to what emo is then it would be pop-punk by perception.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:26 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.