New music. Does it exite like it did back in the day? (hardcore, jazz) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2008, 09:02 PM   #51 (permalink)
w0rd
 
Blain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Suva, Fiji
Posts: 1,034
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by riseagainstrocks View Post
Blain, check out Focus. They have a batch of demo's also but my EHD crashed so until I can regather all my tunes, the full length should have to suffice.
Sounds good, I'll be on the DL tonight.
Blain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 09:09 PM   #52 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by riseagainstrocks View Post
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Don't kid yourself. You of all people should know that I'm far removed from those glorifying shred guitar. I know you read my posts in the DragonForce thread. (and on the specific mention of Malmsteen, he'll always be a guilty pleasure since I started listening to him at age 14, but I know he's nothing more than fast arpeggios and lyrics about vikings)

Folk music in America grew out of traditional Irish, English, and German ballads most often sung in repeated cadence with no chorus' and extremely simple 2-3 chord progressions. I'm taking classes on Music history in college Ethan. I'm not some kid with a "My First Theory Book".

I'm someone with a broad appreciation for talent and I happen to place musicianship and composition over fanbase and tearjerk appeal.
You're still sounding like one of those kids. I would try and have a discussion with you but it's pretty obvious you care more about being so cool and elitist then hearing someone else's opinion and guess what? I find Cynic boring. No amount of inaccurate generalizations about my taste or going on about their technical prowess is going to change that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 10:19 PM   #53 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
riseagainstrocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DC
Posts: 3,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
You're still sounding like one of those kids. I would try and have a discussion with you but it's pretty obvious you care more about being so cool and elitist then hearing someone else's opinion and guess what? I find Cynic boring. No amount of inaccurate generalizations about my taste or going on about their technical prowess is going to change that.

How am I trying to be cool? I'm pointing out that you simply don't have to background to discuss things on this level. You can find Cynic boring if you want. I really don't understand how. Nor does the vast majority of those with a musical education.

and jackhammer I don't see how I went on a tangent. You said that modern music is built off the blues. I agree. However since the origin of this whole discussion was my assertion that emotion in music can only truly carry the weight it was meant to for the writer only, I felt compelled to give my reasoning and then state how your logic did not apply to what I was talking about.

I'll relate this to another medium of art; painting. If a painter painted exactly with emotion, odds are you'd end up with something Pollack-ish. However, if time went into the planning, composition, study, and technique of the painting, you'd end up with some Rembrandt-ish.

Emotion in music is a fine starting place, but with out real ability, it's worthless

and just to clarify, when I use the term technical, I'm not talking about mile a minute sweeps. That Cynic video is a prime example. Odd chord shapes coupled with counterpoint vocal melody create a layered effect that appeals to me in the pure aesthetic sense as well as the mathematical one.
__________________
One note timeless, came out of nowhere...

Last edited by riseagainstrocks; 01-20-2008 at 07:34 PM.
riseagainstrocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 10:31 PM   #54 (permalink)
isfckingdead
 
sleepy jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,967
Default

Wow, I barely know how to respond to that. Emotion IS an important element in music and you can't learn why someone likes something and why someone doesn't like something in a music class, hate to break that to you.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by METALLICA89 View Post
Ive seen you on muiltipul forums saying Metallica and slayer are the worst **** you kid go suck your **** while you listen to your ****ing emo **** I bet you do listen to emo music
sleepy jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 10:40 PM   #55 (permalink)
dontcareaboutyou
 
swim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,188
Default

I like folk oriented music not just in the sound of folk but as an umbrella term of the same certain group of people who write, listen and enjoy folk music which well common people because it has 1/10 to do with notes and rhythms and 9/10 to do with stories, friends and actually putting out something with a little weight to it, for themselves at least. And I disrespect technical music because when you have to justify why something is good with scale degrees used in chords that make it oh so special, time signatures, accidentals, tempo changes, dissonance and what not then it must not be.
__________________
http://nakednaps.bandcamp.com/
swim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 11:01 PM   #56 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
Wow, I barely know how to respond to that. Emotion IS an important element in music and you can't learn why someone likes something and why someone doesn't like something in a music class, hate to break that to you.
You can in a psychology class...Riseagainst, 'good music' isn't something you can explain with numbers. Because someone lacks technical skill doesn't mean they can't write a good song. You don't need extensive training in music theory to write a good melody, and you don't have to take poetry classes to write great lyrics...Music is more than just what you like, and dismissing anyone who doesn't have an associate degree in music theory's opinions is stupid.
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 11:09 PM   #57 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by riseagainstrocks View Post
How am I trying to be cool? I'm pointing out that you simply don't have to background to discuss things on this level. You can find Cynic boring if you want. I really don't understand how. Nor does the vast majority of those with a musical education.
I wasn't aware that people needed a degree in music to discuss it. If I was to go out & get one it wouldn't make me go out and become a fan of Cynic because that type of music does nothing for me. It might help me understand why YOU think they're good , but I already know why you think they're good because you've just said so below.

Quote:
I'll relate this to another medium of art; painting. If a painter painted exactly with emotion, odds are you'd end up with something Pollack-ish. However, if time went into the planning, composition, study, and technique of the painting, you'd end up with some Rembrandt-ish.
But both are equally sought after

Quote:
Emotion in music is a fine starting place, but with out real ability, it's worthless
From a technical standpoint it is. Personally i'm much more interested in the the message behind it & how it's expressed. I am much more interested in people and their experiences and stories than if someones nailed a chord properly.

Quote:
and just to clarify, when I use the term technical, I'm talking about mile a minute sweeps. That Cynic video is a prime example. Odd chord shapes coupled with counterpoint vocal melody create a layered effect that appeals to me in the pure aesthetic sense as well as the mathematical one.
And there's nothing wrong with that , but to me all those things are just window dressing to a song that deep down has very little substance.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 11:17 PM   #58 (permalink)
Diskobox
 
Lizzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 660
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by riseagainstrocks View Post

Emotion in music is a fine starting place, but with out real ability, it's worthless
What on earth are you listening to??
Music is Emotion!!! If you dont have emotion, you simply dont have music, and it doesnt matter how great you are, or how much techniqal skills you have, emotion is a nessetate, or else your simply listening to notes being played
__________________
white and black, are you looking for the sun boy?
the sun doesn't shine down here, no, not in the shadow
Lizzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 11:34 PM   #59 (permalink)
Reformed Jackass
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,964
Default

I agree with you to an extent, but how else do you define music besides (On a simplistic level) notes being played?
ProggyMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2008, 03:51 AM   #60 (permalink)
w0rd
 
Blain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Suva, Fiji
Posts: 1,034
Default

Oi RAR or Wayfarer, reckon you could PM me a link to Focus, I can't find it
Blain is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.