The Official Nirvana/Kurt Cobain Thread (fan, member, quote, artist)

Wild7Dustr · 09-19-2006, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ace

Well put.

Thank you and you're welcome.

Wild7Dustr · 09-19-2006, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo

Making the generalization that all Nirvana fans are 12 years old would be like making the generalization that all Bob Marley fans are Jamacian.

Lol.
Jamaican, mon!!!

glazedface · 09-29-2006, 05:04 PM

Did Nirvana, with its nonsensical lyrics, and its responsibility for the "good musicianship = unhip" trend, kill music? did their introduction to the idea of depression making good rock kill rock n roll as we once knew it? discuss.

swim · 09-29-2006, 05:08 PM

Music would have to be dead for this to be a valid question.

sleepy jack · 09-29-2006, 05:15 PM

rofl

*doesn't know if he shoud lock this*

right-track · 09-29-2006, 05:19 PM

The answer is no.
I'd like to hear your thoughts, if you think otherwise though.

Urban Hat€monger ? · 09-29-2006, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glazedface

Did Nirvana, with its nonsensical lyrics, and its responsibility for the "good musicianship = unhip" trend, kill music?

If they did it begs the question what the hell have I been buying since 1994

glazedface · 09-29-2006, 05:30 PM

I'm sorry, I should have made the original post more neutral. I dont have specific feelings about nirvana, i just wanted to incite discussion and see what the general opinion is here.

ZeppelinAir · 09-29-2006, 05:35 PM

how the hell could they kill music, if anything they helped it recover from a downward spiral, when Nirvana came out in the early 90's it attention away from the punk rock that was growing at the time. They helped drive the influence for other bands like Alice in Chains and Pearl Jam. And both are big to this day

swim · 09-29-2006, 05:38 PM

Uhm maybe I'm alone on this but I think Nirvana is typical alternative punk. Bleach definitely and then they fade more into rock with their later albums.

09-29-2006, 05:04 PM	#1253 (permalink)
glazedface Groupie Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 19	Did Nirvana kill music? Did Nirvana, with its nonsensical lyrics, and its responsibility for the "good musicianship = unhip" trend, kill music? did their introduction to the idea of depression making good rock kill rock n roll as we once knew it? discuss.

09-29-2006, 05:08 PM	#1254 (permalink)
swim dontcareaboutyou Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: North Carolina Posts: 5,188	Music would have to be dead for this to be a valid question. __________________ http://nakednaps.bandcamp.com/

09-29-2006, 05:35 PM	#1259 (permalink)
ZeppelinAir Long time no see Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: somewhere in Michigan Posts: 512	how the hell could they kill music, if anything they helped it recover from a downward spiral, when Nirvana came out in the early 90's it attention away from the punk rock that was growing at the time. They helped drive the influence for other bands like Alice in Chains and Pearl Jam. And both are big to this day __________________ not that old signature

09-29-2006, 05:38 PM	#1260 (permalink)
swim dontcareaboutyou Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: North Carolina Posts: 5,188	Uhm maybe I'm alone on this but I think Nirvana is typical alternative punk. Bleach definitely and then they fade more into rock with their later albums. __________________ http://nakednaps.bandcamp.com/

View Poll Results:
	0	0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

09-29-2006, 05:19 PM	#1256 (permalink)
right-track Atchin' Akai Join Date: May 2005 Location: Unamerica Posts: 8,723	The answer is no. I'd like to hear your thoughts, if you think otherwise though.

09-29-2006, 05:30 PM	#1258 (permalink)
glazedface Groupie Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 19	I'm sorry, I should have made the original post more neutral. I dont have specific feelings about nirvana, i just wanted to incite discussion and see what the general opinion is here.