So just what IS "ROCK" in the main forum sense these days?! (electronic, jazz)

Originally Posted by Laughing Boy

Wow you're way out of my league. Sorry for questioning you, I'm going to go listen to some middle aged balding females with mustaches pop now. Peace out.

Why are you so defensive? Have you read the name of this site yet? Were not supposed to get along, that's what makes it fun. By the way, I added a response to your indie comment, if you still care.

[ProggyMan]

I can't tell if he's just has a really sarcastic sense of humor, or is way too defensive. Called me an ******* for criticizing his choice of dream guitarists.

Originally Posted by ProggyMan

I can't tell if he's just has a really sarcastic sense of humor, or is way too defensive. Called me an ******* for criticizing his choice of dream guitarists.

Lmao. Let's hope it's the former, although sarcasm is pretty hard to convey over the internet I have to admit. He'll learn the ropes of these forums soon enough.

[Dr_Rez]

Originally Posted by ProggyMan

I can't tell if he's just has a really sarcastic sense of humor, or is way too defensive. Called me an ******* for criticizing his choice of dream guitarists.

That does make you an ******* though. It would be best if we all agreed.

Although i guess that makes me an ******* for disagreeing with you.

[ProggyMan]

If you're being humorous I can't tell, sorry. But yah, in the words of Ian Bavitz: Or maybe you're just an *******; and maybe I'm just an *******.

[Dr_Rez]

Haha i was trying to be.

Did not work to well though i guess.

[ProggyMan]

Nah, I lol'ed I just couldn't tell if you were serious.

[Rainard Jalen]

Originally Posted by Slint

For me, rock is a very broad term. It encompasses punk, pop, and indie. I'm not really sure why we have separate forums for punk, pop, and indie. I would just all list them as subforums of rock. This is just my opinion. I really don't think there is such a thing as just plain rock, there is always a style to describe the different types of rock.

I mentioned that once (the case of punk, specifically). But then, if you want to start doing that, you could take it even further and have hiphop as a form of rock. Nah, I think using rock too generally is very risky. Best way is to leave VERY conventionalized genres as they are and with their own label, in spite of the point that they were borne out of rock music.

[Laughing Boy]

Hip hops roots are in jazz and soul, most importantly Gil Scott-Heron. It's not a form of rock at all and wasn't born out of it either. I wish people would stop thinking rock is THE genre.

[Piss Me Off]

Originally Posted by Slint

For me, rock is a very broad term. It encompasses punk, pop, and indie. I'm not really sure why we have separate forums for punk, pop, and indie. I would just all list them as subforums of rock. This is just my opinion. I really don't think there is such a thing as just plain rock, there is always a style to describe the different types of rock.

I'd be against this simply because if everything was lumped into one forum then most threads would be pushed back to the 2nd page in no time at all, its better to have sub-forums.