The Official Metallica Thread (rock, genre, album, quote, 90's)

Stone Magnet · 08-26-2006, 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raine

I don't think Metallica should continue to make albums. Their St. Anger album was probably their worst album ever.

What does that have to do with this one?

Raine · 08-26-2006, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stone Magnet

What does that have to do with this one?

Every metallica Album from the Kill Em All album to the Black Album rocked.
Everything after that wasn't as great.
I don't have high hopes for the next album they release.
Nonetheless I'll still buy it though since it's Metallica.

sleepy jack · 08-26-2006, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stone Magnet

What does that have to do with this one?

Look at your post count!
&St Anger really wasn't that bad, i'm probaly going to like the next one.

Raine · 08-26-2006, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill

&St Anger really wasn't that bad, i'm probaly going to like the next one.

The only reason i even remotely appreciate St. Anger is because I saw Metllica perform a lot of songs off it about two years ago. It was something of a disappointment for me.

~~hiu~~ · 08-26-2006, 09:58 PM

It's not like Metallica was producing stunning albums prior to St Anger anyway. I see them possibly producing something decent similar to their early output if they let Robert Trujillo contibute to the album.

ZeppelinAir · 08-26-2006, 11:18 PM

Metallica shouldnt make a new album, St. Anger wasnt all that great, their early albums where good, but this sucked, chances are the next will suck too

sleepy jack · 08-26-2006, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZeppelinAir

Metallica shouldnt make a new album, St. Anger wasnt all that great, their early albums where good, but this sucked, chances are the next will suck too

Read the post above you, I never thought about that hiu. I hope he gets alott of input.

~~bungalow~~ · 08-26-2006, 11:20 PM

Yeah, because most bands never recover from one bad album right?

As for me, I'm not much of a Metallica fan, so in my eyes, all their albums are garbage. However, it doesn't affect me any if they produce an album, and if it will make them more money, then why not go for it?

Ace · 08-26-2006, 11:22 PM

^ Oh just shut up before you get banned again, Mr. "you have **** taste in music. cheers", person.

~~bungalow~~ · 08-26-2006, 11:23 PM

dumbassayswhat? How about staying on topic okay n00bile.

08-26-2006, 11:18 PM	#286 (permalink)
ZeppelinAir Long time no see Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: somewhere in Michigan Posts: 512	Metallica shouldnt make a new album, St. Anger wasnt all that great, their early albums where good, but this sucked, chances are the next will suck too __________________ not that old signature

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

View Poll Results:
	0	0%
Voters: 0. You may not vote on this poll

08-26-2006, 09:58 PM	#285 (permalink)
~~hiu~~ Account Disabled Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 1,174	It's not like Metallica was producing stunning albums prior to St Anger anyway. I see them possibly producing something decent similar to their early output if they let Robert Trujillo contibute to the album.

08-26-2006, 11:20 PM	#288 (permalink)
~~bungalow~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Hot-lanta Posts: 3,140	Yeah, because most bands never recover from one bad album right? As for me, I'm not much of a Metallica fan, so in my eyes, all their albums are garbage. However, it doesn't affect me any if they produce an album, and if it will make them more money, then why not go for it?

08-26-2006, 11:23 PM	#290 (permalink)
~~bungalow~~ Account Disabled Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Hot-lanta Posts: 3,140	dumbassayswhat? How about staying on topic okay n00bile.