Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Rock & Metal (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-metal/)
-   -   Who Sux More? NickleBack or Puddle Of Mudd (https://www.musicbanter.com/rock-metal/6370-who-sux-more-nickleback-puddle-mudd.html)

DreamTheaterGodly 05-13-2005 09:10 AM

Who Sux More? NickleBack or Puddle Of Mudd
 
I despise both of these bands, but I was wondering if anyone wanted to voice their opinion on who sux the worst.

[MERIT] 05-13-2005 09:11 AM

nickleback sux way more

adidasss 05-13-2005 09:22 AM

well i would put it as who is lamer...nickelback look a lot lamer then puddle of mud, but i would have to say nickelbacks song pissed me off way more then any puddle of mud song...i just didn't see anything special in puddle of mud, whilst nickelback really pissed me off

TheBig3 05-13-2005 09:33 AM

i think your both drunk, and before you pine away like hippy toolbags, **** your opinion. Are you ****ting me? You've opted for Puddle of Mud? At least Nickleback makes good songs. Theres a reason we've only heard 4 puddle of Mudd songs on any sort of mass level. Its because they fired the songwriter and then jacked all his stuff to make the first album. Then they hired professional songwriters to do the second disc so they wouldn't completly embarass themselves. Waste of money that was.

Puddle of Mudd was as middle of the road, suburban preteen BS as you could get. They did everything that everyone else did just so they could nestle safely in the post-grunge market. There is no redeeming quilty to this band, they didn't make one good song. Finding an audience because your first single says "I love the way you smack my ass" is the first sign that you suck. End of story. I can't believe that any one would option them out of these two.

adidasss 05-13-2005 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog
i think your both drunk, and before you pine away like hippy toolbags, **** your opinion. Are you ****ting me? You've opted for Puddle of Mud? At least Nickleback makes good songs. Theres a reason we've only heard 4 puddle of Mudd songs on any sort of mass level. Its because they fired the songwriter and then jacked all his stuff to make the first album. Then they hired professional songwriters to do the second disc so they wouldn't completly embarass themselves. Waste of money that was.

Puddle of Mudd was as middle of the road, suburban preteen BS as you could get. They did everything that everyone else did just so they could nestle safely in the post-grunge market. There is no redeeming quilty to this band, they didn't make one good song. Finding an audience because your first single says "I love the way you smack my ass" is the first sign that you suck. End of story. I can't believe that any one would option them out of these two.

sorry...i chose indifference to irritation...

ashatteredhope 05-13-2005 09:43 AM

i say ....none of them. i hate them both. i would pull off my ears and eat them before i was forced to listen to thier music.

High King Tigernmas 05-13-2005 09:49 AM

They both suck so bad...If I had to chose it would be the ole Nickelback had to go though...

Dark Cloud 05-13-2005 11:06 AM

they both suck they make pod sound good well not really

lilbloodredridinghood 05-13-2005 11:19 AM

I can't even choose, I don't listen to either so they both suck equally to me...or just don't catch my attention. See? I can't even decide that, I just don't listen to them. So..**** em.

[MERIT] 05-13-2005 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dark Cloud
they both suck they make pod sound good well not really

what swrong w/ POD?

The Drunken Terd 05-13-2005 12:00 PM

Nickelback...They suck donkey b@lls

Jaz 05-13-2005 12:30 PM

Okie I'm going to risk what little music credibility I have, I actually like Puddle Of Mudd alot, shock horror. Hey don't frown at me, they are well kewl. So okie they sound a bit cheesy sometimes but some of their songs can be catchy as hell. And don't tell me you haven't sung along to 'How You Remind Me' by Nickelback ;) (though do agree with majority of comments, if I had to choose Nickelback would get the chop)

IMATOOL 05-13-2005 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog
i think your both drunk, and before you pine away like hippy toolbags, **** your opinion. Are you ****ting me? You've opted for Puddle of Mud? At least Nickleback makes good songs. Theres a reason we've only heard 4 puddle of Mudd songs on any sort of mass level. Its because they fired the songwriter and then jacked all his stuff to make the first album. Then they hired professional songwriters to do the second disc so they wouldn't completly embarass themselves. Waste of money that was.

Puddle of Mudd was as middle of the road, suburban preteen BS as you could get. They did everything that everyone else did just so they could nestle safely in the post-grunge market. There is no redeeming quilty to this band, they didn't make one good song. Finding an audience because your first single says "I love the way you smack my ass" is the first sign that you suck. End of story. I can't believe that any one would option them out of these two.

Dude you can't be any more right! Now im no nickelback fan or anything but i do think puddle of mud is total crap, at least nickleback's songs have a point, like beating your wife is wrong, i agree with that what dose puddle of mud say " i like the way you smack my ass" what the fuuck is that shiit?!!!

Jaz 05-13-2005 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IMATOOL
i agree with that what dose puddle of mud say " i like the way you smack my ass" what the fuuck is that shiit?!!!

Spanking is good.

Urban Hat€monger ? 05-13-2005 01:38 PM

I`m not going to choose , it`s too pointless to even enter my head which of these total waste of spaces are worse.

In fact I only came in here to post a picture of Keith

http://the-light.com/longhair/photos/keith.jpg

IMATOOL 05-13-2005 01:45 PM

yeah whos keith?

ArtistInTheAmbulance 05-13-2005 01:48 PM

Who cares, its better than this topic...

Urban Hat€monger ? 05-13-2005 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IMATOOL
yeah whos keith?

I have absolutley no idea

ArtistInTheAmbulance 05-13-2005 01:58 PM

His face isn't symmetrical..

Urban Hat€monger ? 05-13-2005 02:02 PM

Looks to me like someone smacked him in the face with a frying pan 5 seconds before the pic was taken

ArtistInTheAmbulance 05-13-2005 02:03 PM

Haha it does aswel... I like how his eyes are looking in seperate directions...

maryjane88 05-13-2005 02:08 PM

Neither I Love Them Both Equally

coffeeshop 05-13-2005 02:17 PM

I like some Puddle of Mudd 'Away From Me' and 'Blurry' but Nickelback is just boring.

TheBig3 05-13-2005 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coffeeshop
I like some Puddle of Mudd 'Away From Me' and 'Blurry' but Nickelback is just boring.

I almost demand you tell me what is enthralling about POM

Merkaba 05-13-2005 04:30 PM

I watched a thing on tv a few months back about how much of a struggle it was for nickleback to make it big. When they finally got their contract they gave into what the record company wanted from them. I dont know if you've actually listened to their songs but all the radio ones are all about love, about the same parts of love too, like losing a loved one for example. They just have slightly different muisc with each of their songs to make them seem like a completely different song.

Kinda makes me feel they should have just layed low to start with. I dont know if the same sort of story applies to PoM but i presume it would.

Anywaaaaaaay, i think they're both a load of rubbish, along with POD and all that sort of stuff

TheBig3 05-13-2005 06:18 PM

What "thing" was this. I don't want to come off as a Nickleback advocate but they have better songs than POM. ANd their first CD (major label) wasn't exactly radio friendly (like the second one was).

IMATOOL 05-13-2005 06:22 PM

Its all crap! I like SYSTEM OF A DOWN. just thought i'd add that

Wyldchild 05-13-2005 10:56 PM

They are both s h i t!!

Nickellback are worse though!! YUK

Merkaba 05-13-2005 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog
What "thing" was this. I don't want to come off as a Nickleback advocate but they have better songs than POM. ANd their first CD (major label) wasn't exactly radio friendly (like the second one was).

I cant remember but it was sort of like music biography program.

SteelyDan79 05-14-2005 12:10 AM

i think Puddle of Mudd sucks more....i don`t know why...but somehow the lead singer reminds me of Ugly Kid Joe....and Kid really sucks ass!!!


say you don`t need no diamond rings...and i`ll be satified...

coffeeshop 05-19-2005 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog
I almost demand you tell me what is enthralling about POM

Just those two songs really...

ish 05-19-2005 08:15 PM

Well I think both of those bands are kind of s*** but it doesn't really matter. There are still people who actually like those bands and I respect their decision to listen to crap music. Nah im just joking but I still think those arent the best bands in the wolrd.

dead_ringer 06-23-2005 02:53 AM

puddle of mudd rule sometimes but sometimes they suk

Krosstika 06-23-2005 01:36 PM

May both bands suck the c**k of Satan for all eternity!!!
They both are pure turd :finger:

Respect to those that like them mind you...but i just dont rate em
...and another thing...are they still going???

NaNaNer 12-29-2006 09:15 AM

I saw Nickelback (I took my sister for her b-day) and it was something she really really wanted..so I went, got ripped, sat back and watched her have a really good time...the music wasnt as bad as some and I did find myself singing along to "you remind me of what I" and I dont own anything by either band..though I did strip to the one Puddle of Mudd song "control"..they both suck..but Puddle of Mudd did feature some drummage by Josh Freese...

TheBig3 12-29-2006 10:07 AM

I'm really glad you brought this thread out from the crypt, because as I was advocating; look which band is still kicking. To quote Rolling Stone:

"[Nickle Back] was one of the only non-emo rock bands that sold anything in 06"

And puddle of mud is a painful memory. I'm sure you'll complain that NB is a persistant painful memory but since I beat you to your own crappy one-liner you're going to need to come up with something else.

I don't think anyone is saying (and im certainly not) that their the next beatles, but honestly I'd rather listen to "Rock Star" than most of the other crap that makes pop radio, but I concede that "I love you" or whatever its called is aimed at making cash and women.

NaNaNer 12-29-2006 10:14 AM

Nickelback's demographics are what makes them money...

Not their talent.

Rainard Jalen 12-29-2006 10:45 AM

haha.

What are people's issues with Nickleback? Nickleback are, COMMERCIALLY speaking, a good band! They write catchy melodies and hooks that are radio-friendly. They churn out hit after hit.

Now, don't get me wrong - sure, their music may be derivative, unoriginal, redundant, clichéd, even ridiculous, but your casual music listener likes it! They write for the mainstream masses, and among those bands who are attempting to do this and have this in mind when writing, Nickleback are pretty much the best of the lot!

Commercial rock ain't art, folks. The purpose is to design a product and make as much money out of it as possible. It's a craft. And these Canadians are skilled craftsmen...if (obviously) not particularly musically talented or virtuosic.

On the side...it pisses me off when I see critics review Nickleback as if they're supposed to be anything besides derivative, and give their albums 2 stars for that reason. And then, they give Shakira's latest works 90/100. Shakira's music is among the most derivative, clichéd garbage I've ever heard. What happened to consistency, I wonder...

riseagainstrocks 12-29-2006 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen (Post 318293)
haha.

What are people's issues with Nickleback? Nickleback are, COMMERCIALLY speaking, a good band! They write catchy melodies and hooks that are radio-friendly. They churn out hit after hit.

Now, don't get me wrong - sure, their music may be derivative, unoriginal, redundant, clichéd, even ridiculous, but your casual music listener likes it! They write for the mainstream masses, and among those bands who are attempting to do this and have this in mind when writing, Nickleback are pretty much the best of the lot!

Commercial rock ain't art, folks. The purpose is to design a product and make as much money out of it as possible. It's a craft. And these Canadians are skilled craftsmen...if (obviously) not particularly musically talented or virtuosic.

Best post of the year? I agree with every bit of it. Nickleback are garbage. BUT THAT'S THE POINT! People who actually like music aren't supposed to like them. It's radio-friendly background music.

ØØ Void 12-29-2006 10:59 AM

Nickelback would be better if they hadn't been releasing the same song over and over again for about five years now.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.