The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (lyrics, dancing, metal, pop) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Rock & Metal > Rock N Roll, Classic Rock & 60s Rock
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones 1,000,000,059 99.90%
Beatles 1,000,073 0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2006, 05:57 PM   #181 (permalink)
killedmyraindog
 
TheBig3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Posts: 11,172
Default

Tu che. and since when is Miss You a bad song? I think it personally is one of the better stones song.
__________________
I've moved to a new address
TheBig3 is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 06:01 PM   #182 (permalink)
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default

It helps that The Beatles never made a mediocre studio album while The Stones have made a few.
__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
I only listen to Santana when I feel like being annoyed.
I only listen to you talk when I want to hear Emo performed acapella.
boo boo is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 06:02 PM   #183 (permalink)
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by franscar
I think that always works in a bands favour. The Beatles will always be a band that people will say split up "too soon." The Stones unfortunately weren't pulled apart by a massive ego collision and a nutty oriental bird.
The Beatles went out in their prime, The Stones have been way past their prime for over 20 years, imo.
__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
I only listen to Santana when I feel like being annoyed.
I only listen to you talk when I want to hear Emo performed acapella.
boo boo is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 06:19 PM   #184 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by franscar
I think that always works in a bands favour. The Beatles will always be a band that people will say split up "too soon." The Stones unfortunately weren't pulled apart by a massive ego collision and a nutty oriental bird.
I disagree.

The Beatles broke up when they were still considered great, and that's how people will always remember them.

The Stones will be remembered by many as a band who should've known when to quit. They're reminiscent of a professional athlete who refuses to retire, then ends his career with many people either shaking their heads or booing at his weak performances.
__________________
"Paranoid is just like an anchor. It really secures everything about the metal movement in one record. It's all there: the riffs, the vocal performance of Ozzy, the song titles, what the lyrics are about. It's just a classic defining moment."

--Rob Halford of Judas Priest
Music Man is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 06:21 PM   #185 (permalink)
Honky
 
franscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Music Man
I disagree.

The Beatles broke up when they were still considered great, and that's how people will always remember them.

The Stones will be remembered by many as a band who should've known when to quit. They're reminiscent of a professional athlete who refuses to retire, then ends his career with many people either shaking their heads or booing at his weak performances.
Why do you disagree when that's pretty much what I said only in different words?
__________________
Franscar is metal. You are not.
franscar is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 06:27 PM   #186 (permalink)
Freeskier
 
jibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople...
Posts: 1,536
Default

It's funny how when a band stops making music has such a huge impact on how good of a band they're considered to be. So how much of a factor is it really? When it comes down to it, does it matter that the Stones made a few mediocre albums when they (arguably) had just as many successful ones as the Beatles?
__________________
What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road.
William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways


Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass.

HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER
jibber is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 06:31 PM   #187 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 34
Default

I like the Beatles more, simply because I enjoy the writing more (espically lennon's obviously). Plus they were more consistant and really grew as a band in a way I feel the Stones didn't do as much.
__________________
"And if my thought-dreams could be seen They'd probably put my head in a guillotine"
MrFloyd is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 06:35 PM   #188 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo
It helps that The Beatles never made a mediocre studio album while The Stones have made a few.
I'd say the Stones have made more than a few.

But you are correct--the Beatles were consistently great from their debut album through "Abbey Road". I sincerely doubt any other band in history has been that consistent over the course of so many albums. Their output was prodigious, considering the relatively short time they were together, yet the high quality of their music was unquestioned from beginning to end.
__________________
"Paranoid is just like an anchor. It really secures everything about the metal movement in one record. It's all there: the riffs, the vocal performance of Ozzy, the song titles, what the lyrics are about. It's just a classic defining moment."

--Rob Halford of Judas Priest
Music Man is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 06:35 PM   #189 (permalink)
Freeskier
 
jibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Istanbul was Constantinople now it's Istanbul not Constantinople...
Posts: 1,536
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFloyd
I like the Beatles more, simply because I enjoy the writing more (espically lennon's obviously). Plus they were more consistant and really grew as a band in a way I feel the Stones didn't do as much.
See I look at it differently. I see where you're coming from and how you came to your conclusion, but I look at what I consider the best beatles songs, and the best Stones songs, and I see two bands that are pretty equal in terms of lyrical content and musical ability.
__________________
What you've done becomes the judge of what you're going to do -- especially in other people's minds. When you're traveling, you are what you are right there and then. People don't have your past to hold against you. No yesterdays on the road.
William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways


Your toughest competitor lives in your head. Some days his name is fear, or pain, or gravity. Stomp his ass.

HOOKED ON THE WHITE POWDER
jibber is offline  
Old 01-17-2006, 06:36 PM   #190 (permalink)
Honky
 
franscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jibber
It's funny how when a band stops making music has such a huge impact on how good of a band they're considered to be. So how much of a factor is it really? When it comes down to it, does it matter that the Stones made a few mediocre albums when they (arguably) had just as many successful ones as the Beatles?
I guess for me it's that growing up the first reference point I ever had of the Stones was Jagger making an almighty tit of himself on 'Dancing in the Street'. That isn't something you can easily forget when you're young. It influences you. It took me years to summon up the courage to listen to a Bowie album because of that song.
__________________
Franscar is metal. You are not.
franscar is offline  
Closed Thread


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.