The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles (blues, country, Polish, American)

beardovstars · 09-30-2005, 05:15 AM

right okay now for a start When i wake up in the morning Im glad I have both testicles..I routinely check for em..make sure they are there. You know. Imagine if you lost one..wouldnt feel quite right. kay.
Girl equivalent must be a breast.
The stones admit basing their career (early on) on the beatles when they wore SURPRISE matching outfits. the also played mostly covers. MOst blues bands did likewise a the time. The beatles actually wrote the stones a tune around this time. The stones then decided to be the anti beatles and be scruffy as the beatles where the clean cut guys. Not as rock admittedly!
doesnt mean much really??
But To say the Beatles songs all sound the same is dropping your pants in public.
Say you dont like em. Fair play. But saying they are all the same aint true.
To finalise I CANNOT CHOOSE BEtween my left and right nuts.
No vote from me.

dog · 09-30-2005, 06:47 AM

^heh you got a smile outta me

dancer_maniac · 09-30-2005, 07:28 AM

i would have to say the beatles, cos stones are too rock, now i dont mind the occasional rock song, some are ok, but for me rock is just another word for lazy music. sorry if i bursted anyones bubble... thats just my oppinion, u dont have to agree, u decide.
~han~

DontRunMeOver · 09-30-2005, 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beardovstars

To finalise I CANNOT CHOOSE BEtween my left and right nuts.

That was fantastic. Not sure I understood what you were getting at but you're right all the same.

dancer_maniac · 09-30-2005, 07:31 AM

right...
~han~

DontRunMeOver · 09-30-2005, 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beardovstars

right okay now for a start When i wake up in the morning Im glad I have both testicles..I routinely check for em..make sure they are there. You know. Imagine if you lost one..wouldnt feel quite right.

Speaking of which, apparently Tupac lost a testicle after his non-fatal shooting in New York. He didn't write any raps about this did he? If you're writing lyrics about how unfair life can be, surely being a famous, virile young guy and then losing a testicle has to count as one of the more bitter ironies. Testicle loss has been unduly ignored as an issue in modern songwriting...

DontRunMeOver · 09-30-2005, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dancer_maniac

right...
~han~

Sorry dancer_maniac, I wasn't talking about your post. Although of course I agree with it!

dancer_maniac · 09-30-2005, 07:38 AM

lol, k.... i forgive u

basktblplayr04 · 09-30-2005, 01:17 PM

kinda tough but im goin wit stones

Fire_Starter · 10-01-2005, 11:33 AM

i like both.... but Beatles are diferent from Stones.... i dont know how to said it but i have heard STone all my life... "i cant get no.... satisfaction..."

View Poll Results: Stones or Beatles
Stones	1,000,000,059	99.90%
Beatles	1,000,073	0.10%
Voters: 1001000132. You may not vote on this poll

09-30-2005, 05:15 AM	#101 (permalink)
beardovstars Groupie Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: a city in australia Posts: 19	right okay now for a start When i wake up in the morning Im glad I have both testicles..I routinely check for em..make sure they are there. You know. Imagine if you lost one..wouldnt feel quite right. kay. Girl equivalent must be a breast. The stones admit basing their career (early on) on the beatles when they wore SURPRISE matching outfits. the also played mostly covers. MOst blues bands did likewise a the time. The beatles actually wrote the stones a tune around this time. The stones then decided to be the anti beatles and be scruffy as the beatles where the clean cut guys. Not as rock admittedly! doesnt mean much really?? But To say the Beatles songs all sound the same is dropping your pants in public. Say you dont like em. Fair play. But saying they are all the same aint true. To finalise I CANNOT CHOOSE BEtween my left and right nuts. No vote from me. __________________ unlearn and evolve

09-30-2005, 06:47 AM	#102 (permalink)
dog this bird has flown Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: paris,texas Posts: 860	^heh you got a smile outta me __________________ formerly ledzeppelinrulz. http://theraffinkids.bandcamp.com/ music^

09-30-2005, 07:28 AM	#103 (permalink)
dancer_maniac Groupie Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: on planet earth Posts: 7	i would have to say the beatles, cos stones are too rock, now i dont mind the occasional rock song, some are ok, but for me rock is just another word for lazy music. sorry if i bursted anyones bubble... thats just my oppinion, u dont have to agree, u decide. ~han~ __________________ Dancer_maniac

09-30-2005, 07:31 AM	#105 (permalink)
dancer_maniac Groupie Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: on planet earth Posts: 7	right... ~han~ __________________ Dancer_maniac

09-30-2005, 07:38 AM	#108 (permalink)
dancer_maniac Groupie Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: on planet earth Posts: 7	lol, k.... i forgive u __________________ Dancer_maniac

09-30-2005, 01:17 PM	#109 (permalink)
basktblplayr04 Groupie Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 12	kinda tough but im goin wit stones

10-01-2005, 11:33 AM	#110 (permalink)
Fire_Starter Groupie Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Peru Posts: 17	i like both.... but Beatles are diferent from Stones.... i dont know how to said it but i have heard STone all my life... "i cant get no.... satisfaction..."