The BCS (country, title, quote, memory, talented)

Bane of your existence · 03-23-2009, 11:37 PM

Are we a homer or what? I don't see how else people pick Ore and Cal year after year to do sht.
UCLA and Stanford improving will do about what Iowa St and Baylor improving will do to help the image of the Big XII, not much.

ProggyMan · 03-23-2009, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bane of your existence

Are we a homer or what? I don't see how else people pick Ore and Cal year after year to do sht.
UCLA and Stanford improving will do about what Iowa St and Baylor improving will do to help the image of the Big XII, not much.

Oregon would have been in the NC a few years ago if Dixon hadn't gotten hurt, Cal has the most talent they've had since 04-05, UCLA and Stanford will both be bowl teams, that's the difference between them and the Big XII's bottom lowliest.

Bane of your existence · 03-24-2009, 12:39 AM

Would have been a few years ago except... I see three things wrong there.
Stanford won 5 games last year, UCLA won 4.
Big XII had seven teams with atleast 8 wins.
Pac 10 doesn't even kind of compare. So no, USC would not leapfrog Texas if they both finished with the same record.

Yukon Cornelius · 03-24-2009, 09:54 AM

I would like Tebow to go away.

ProggyMan · 03-24-2009, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Would have been a few years ago except... I see three things wrong there.
Stanford won 5 games last year, UCLA won 4.

And they'll both be much improved.

Quote:

Big XII had seven teams with atleast 8 wins.

I'd say that while the Big XII is slightly better, that's more a product of weak scheduling and 1 fewer conference game, which basically gives the Pac-10 an extra 10 losses.

Quote:

Pac 10 doesn't even kind of compare. So no, USC would not leapfrog Texas if they both finished with the same record.

I never said USC would leapfrog Texas...I just think they're a much better team.

dac · 03-24-2009, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProggyMan

I never said USC would leapfrog Texas...I just think they're a much better team.

Both are going to be good, but Texas has what I think is the best field general in America, whereas USC does have a battle going on there, and when it comes to comparisons like that, the issue cannot be overlooked.

Bane of your existence · 03-24-2009, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProggyMan

I never said USC would leapfrog Texas...I just think they're a much better team.

Oh, I thought that's what we were talking about.

ProggyMan · 03-24-2009, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dac

Both are going to be good, but Texas has what I think is the best field general in America, whereas USC does have a battle going on there, and when it comes to comparisons like that, the issue cannot be overlooked.

True, there's a battle, but Aaron Corp and Mitch Mustain would start at all but 3 or 4 other universities.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bane of your existence

Oh, I thought that's what we were talking about.

No, I'd imagine Texas would get the nod, like last year (They finished ranked ahead of USC), even though USC has the much tougher schedule.

Bane of your existence · 03-24-2009, 09:30 PM

Well I think that all had to do with the nature of their losses. Texas lost to a one loss team on the road on a final play.

Either way, I don't know if I see either team beating Florida.

ProggyMan · 03-24-2009, 09:50 PM

Really? USC is just the most talented team in the country, plain and simple...I just don't think Florida has the size and physicality to compete with a team like that.

03-24-2009, 09:54 AM	#164 (permalink)
Yukon Cornelius Music Addict Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Texas Posts: 625	I would like Tebow to go away. __________________ Attempting to find a cure for Stupid...

03-23-2009, 11:37 PM	#161 (permalink)
Bane of your existence Such That Join Date: May 2007 Location: Austin, Tx Posts: 1,197	Are we a homer or what? I don't see how else people pick Ore and Cal year after year to do sht. UCLA and Stanford improving will do about what Iowa St and Baylor improving will do to help the image of the Big XII, not much.

03-24-2009, 12:39 AM	#163 (permalink)
Bane of your existence Such That Join Date: May 2007 Location: Austin, Tx Posts: 1,197	Would have been a few years ago except... I see three things wrong there. Stanford won 5 games last year, UCLA won 4. Big XII had seven teams with atleast 8 wins. Pac 10 doesn't even kind of compare. So no, USC would not leapfrog Texas if they both finished with the same record.

03-24-2009, 09:30 PM	#169 (permalink)
Bane of your existence Such That Join Date: May 2007 Location: Austin, Tx Posts: 1,197	Well I think that all had to do with the nature of their losses. Texas lost to a one loss team on the road on a final play. Either way, I don't know if I see either team beating Florida.

03-24-2009, 09:50 PM	#170 (permalink)
ProggyMan Reformed Jackass Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3,964	Really? USC is just the most talented team in the country, plain and simple...I just don't think Florida has the size and physicality to compete with a team like that.