The Beatles vs The Beach Boys - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Pop
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2010, 11:23 AM   #41 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Buttholeville
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VocalsBass View Post
Why do you presume, (I am) suggesting Wilson was the first person to ever introduce doubletracking?
"Wilson made the production decision in 63 to use doubletracking on the groups vocals" is the only statement I made, since the subject was Brian Wilson & The Beach Boys, and not Les Paul.

You did not state that; THIS is EXACTLY what you posted:

Quote:
Originally Posted by VocalsBass View Post
Its interesting the way he introduced 'doubletracking' into production at that certain time in 1963
nowhere did you clarify that he "introduced" double-tracking to recordings specific to Beach Boys recordings.

I guess, by that measure, George Martin introduced it to the Beatles (in 1962); Jimmy Page "introduced" it to Led Zeppelin...Trent Reznor introduced himself to the concept...an awful lot of "introducing" going on.

Now, instead of being wrong, that statement was redundant; got it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by VocalsBass View Post
You should add a small review of your own with some substance to the thread concerning one or both of the bands mentioned, instead of twisting & turning other peoples words/posts, in order to fit your own personal opinion.
so...my opinion is only valid if it's NOT in response to what someone else posted?

all music is subjective; therefore, it's ALL about opinion.

All except for Brian Wilson "introducing" multi-track recording to the Beach Boys in 1963 - that is rock and roll FACT.
telepicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 03:34 PM   #42 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by telepicker View Post
You did not state that; THIS is EXACTLY what you posted:

All except for Brian Wilson "introducing" multi-track recording to the Beach Boys in 1963 - that is rock and roll FACT.
Yes..I see.. Do you mean that I shouldnt worry about the small things?
^or..should I feel like 'a small fish on a BIG fukking hook'.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 04:06 PM   #43 (permalink)
The Great Disappearer
 
Davey Moore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: URI Campus and Coventry, both in RI
Posts: 462
Default

This isn't even a close comparison. In every category, from the quality of songwriting to influence on their time period, The Beatles are champs. In my mind the only people to rival them in terms of quality from that time period were Dylan and The Stones. Though I think Dylan tops them all, but that's just me.
__________________
The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over.
Davey Moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 12:28 AM   #44 (permalink)
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Buttholeville
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VocalsBass View Post
Yes..I see.. Do you mean that I shouldnt worry about the small things?
^or..should I feel like 'a small fish on a BIG fukking hook'.
idk -it's your life; the choice is yours.

Nice way to avoid the question I asked you, though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davey Moore View Post
This isn't even a close comparison. In every category, from the quality of songwriting to influence on their time period, The Beatles are champs. In my mind the only people to rival them in terms of quality from that time period were Dylan and The Stones. Though I think Dylan tops them all, but that's just me.
finally, a sane voice of reason.
telepicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 03:05 AM   #45 (permalink)
Divination
 
Necromancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,655
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by telepicker View Post
idk -it's your life; the choice is yours.

Nice way to avoid the question I asked you, though.


I prefer to listen to the Beach Boys music more often than I listen to the Beatles, just a personal preferance.
Necromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 06:40 AM   #46 (permalink)
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by streetwaves View Post
Pet Sounds is on a completely different level than Help. Help is nothing more than a pop record, you're right. Pet Sounds, though, is full of impeccable arrangements and it's certainly more emotionally powerful.
So is a lot of music that you kids hate so much and call overblown and whatever. Why is Pet Sounds the greatest pop record? Because it has such lush arrangements? The arrangements are very ahead of their time but the music structure is nothing out of the ordinary in pop music. Besides lush arrangements in pop music wasn't really anything new, guys like Burt Bacherach (an undeniable influence on Pet Sounds) were doing it all the time.

By comparison lets look at two other records released that year. Freak Out by the Mothers of Invention while far less accessible was something never done before in rock or pop music, a combination of biting social satire, genre parody and crazy avant garde experimentation. It was a commercial failure but it's influence and innovations are argubly greater than Pet Sounds.

The other groundbreaking record of that year is more obviously Revolver by The Beatles. Unlike Pet Sounds this was NOT just pop music with more elaborate arrangements. Every song is in a different style, while some were The Beatles attempt at already established forms of pop music, others were brave new experiments, the band and George Martin used all kinds of new techniques and gadgets that really showed what could be done in a studio, stuff that couldn't be imitated live at the time. Sgt Peppers and Magical Mystery Tour expanded on these concepts and were the gateway to progressive rock music.

That being said you can still say Pet Sounds is the better record in pure musical quality, I'm just tired of everyone saying it's the most important record ever made.
__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
I only listen to Santana when I feel like being annoyed.
I only listen to you talk when I want to hear Emo performed acapella.
boo boo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 04:52 AM   #47 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 8
Default

Dude Seriously, is there a comparison?
__________________
Link removed by moderator - no promotions please
staurtjohn321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2010, 07:40 PM   #48 (permalink)
The Great Disappearer
 
Davey Moore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: URI Campus and Coventry, both in RI
Posts: 462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boo boo View Post
The other groundbreaking record of that year is more obviously Revolver by The Beatles. Unlike Pet Sounds this was NOT just pop music with more elaborate arrangements. Every song is in a different style, while some were The Beatles attempt at already established forms of pop music, others were brave new experiments, the band and George Martin used all kinds of new techniques and gadgets that really showed what could be done in a studio, stuff that couldn't be imitated live at the time. Sgt Peppers and Magical Mystery Tour expanded on these concepts and were the gateway to progressive rock music.
Good point. I've never heard anyone say something along the lines of 'that kind of thing was never heard before The Beach Boys did it.'

On the other hand, had anybody really made a song like Tomorrow Never Knows until Tomorrow Never Knows came out?
__________________
The Edge... there is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over.
Davey Moore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2010, 03:47 PM   #49 (permalink)
Way Out There
 
almauro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 850
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt View Post
I think Help! really is the start of The Beatles and I'd have it over Pet Sounds any day. Even though Pet Sounds has more of a complex Psychedelic sound to it, I think Help! song for song is a great Pop record.
Come on, Pet Sounds is far better than Help!. The best thing I can say about Help! was the Beatles finally figured out how to take a Ringo Starr song and use it as comic relief . The Beatles were obviously more consistent, but other than the 2nd half of "Abbey Road", they just don't move me the way a great Brian Wilson song like "Surfs Up" does. I think, the Beach Boys and Wilson's orchestrated pop and the amazing vocal harmonies and arrangements, we're the first to prove pop music could be ethereal, transformational and transcendental. That's not to say the Beach Boys didn't put out their far share of duds, but I find their peaks more essential than the Beatles.
__________________
rock n music blog
almauro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2010, 06:27 PM   #50 (permalink)
bpn
Groupie
 
bpn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheCunningStunt View Post
I think Help is extremely underrated. I find the transition from Help, through to Rubber Soul through to Revolver really interesting. The way they all developed, I think The Beatles owe Help a lot. So much of their songwriting on that record was great, even though it was very true to its bubble-gum roots, it started to get better. I think Help! really is the start of The Beatles and I'd have it over Pet Sounds any day. Even though Pet Sounds has more of a complex Psychedelic sound to it, I think Help! song for song is a great Pop record.
Agreed completely with this.

Help! really started a string of great Beatles albums. It really isn't that much like their first 4 albums.
bpn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.