Urban Hat€monger ?

People wanted a laid back forum so that was the way it was moderated, it seems a bit curlish to me to blame the mods after the fact.

The whole point of this matter isn't 'people are being nasty the mods should do something' that doesn't help anybody. We already know this, that's why the thread was created in the first place.

We're dealing with grey areas here
We want to know at what point do people consider a post to be inflammatory?
How much leeway do we give before we step in?
You can say things like 'isn't it obvious' or 'you're a mod it's up to you' but it should be pointed out even when all the drama was going on there were some saying that these people were doing nothing wrong and we shouldn't have acted.

Nobody can't have it both ways, Does the forum want us to be stricter in the moderation of this or not? Give us feedback on things you think should be acceptable & what shouldn't. And if they do will they stop giving us a hard time when we do just what they ask for?

Like I said earlier in the thread, people are all for stricter moderation until they're the recipient of it.

__________________