Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 2000560)

And it's called the statute of limitations, you dunce. Those guys ain't gettin' put nowhere.

Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 2000560)

Yes, women are completely unaware that if they make accusations of sexual assault against a public figure that the immediate reaction will be to ensure that they are the Virgin Mary and woe be to any woman who ever wore a v-neck.

And it's called the statute of limitations, you dunce. Those guys ain't gettin' put nowhere.

Originally Posted by Chula Vista (Post 2000562)

Maryland doesn't have one I believe. But still, the story has already fallen apart. One of the dudes already denied the allegation and is even a friend of Fords and the guy who introduced her to Kavanaugh.

Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 2000565)

multiple charges were dropped because of the statue of limitations, dork

the ones he was convicted for fell within it, believe it was a 12 year period

stop just saying ****, without doing the most basic research

Originally Posted by Anteater (Post 2000563)

1. Not a bad career move long-term. Worked for some of Clinton's accusers. I smell some New York Times bestsellers in 2019. :clap:

2. Bill Cosby is crying puddin' pop tears right about now.



But we gotta hear everyonnnnnesss's stories. Don't dismiss people just because nobody can corroborate what they're saying. :laughing:

Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 2000569)

I would say that this is why I'm dubious that you're a successful businessman under 30 but Donald Trump, ya know?

Originally Posted by Anteater (Post 2000572)

Apples and papayas Batso.

Originally Posted by Anteater (Post 2000557)

Lol what are you talking about. I'm not a conspiracy theorist: Neither side can corroborate anything in this particular case. You don't think the women are suspicious but two guys who will literally go to prison for the rest of their lives are moreso. Unlike those two bozos who claim to have been the gropers, rapists, whatever, these women who testify will walk out of this with zero consequences regardless of whether or not Kavanaugh wins out because memory is malleable and they can claim as much later on. They'll go back to their ordinary lives unless a future investigation somehow uncovers more substantial evidence that implicates them later on.

Originally Posted by wolverinewolfweiselpigeon (Post 2000579)

It must be easy to be so frivolous about sexual assault and victims of trauma when you have (presumably) no personal experience with it.

Stepping away from this thread at least until after this hearing concludes. It's triggering af to be honest.

Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 2000583)

On a scale of 1 to 10, 1 being "definitely not" and 10 being "definitely", what are the chances your next five or so posts in this thread are going to be you bitching about people calling you stupid?

Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 2000719)

No one cares.

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 2000728)

https://apple.news/AY0AGY7lsTHOYJ9cjb-PBMg



**** Texas

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 2000724)

Not until it's their problem or a point of virtue signaling.

Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 2000746)

People who use "virtue signaling" unironically are morons.

Originally Posted by Fluff (Post 2000755)

Utter bollocks no they aren't it's a fucking great phrase.

Using 'cuck' unironically yes, 'virtue signalling' no.

Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 2000759)

It's absolutely garbage. If you're using it it's because you have no way to argue against someone's point and are just using an ad hominem so you can pat yourself on the back (usually as a good red pill twit).

Originally Posted by Fluff (Post 2000760)

Bollocks.

You can use it at the same time as countering an argument so stop trying so hard tbh.

Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 2000761)

In which case it's pointless because you've already explained why the person is full of **** and are using an ad hominem you got from 4Chan or some comment section populated by other red pill twits. Have you ever seen a liberal use virtue signalling? I haven't. Just internet "skeptics" (i.e. self-important alt right fetus sniffers).

Originally Posted by Fluff (Post 2000762)

I don't care who uses it, the phrase is absolutely bang on. And if a liberal did use it you'd likely be all for it tbh.

Originally Posted by windsock (Post 2000763)

And "ad hominem" is usually a deflector term used by people when they're clearly losing an argument. What's your point?

Originally Posted by 66Sexy (Post 2000764)

What are you talking about? You've promoted red pill nonsense in the past, you don't believe in any kind of privilege, you post Pepe memes, you have a redneck limey boner for the British flag, blah blah blah. The only reason you like the phrase is because it's used by people whose social and political views align with your own against people whose views do not. It's just self-indulgent echo chamber bull**** for you.

Originally Posted by Fluff (Post 2000768)

This is the third post in a row you've mentioned the phrase 'red pill'. Have you recently discovered it? Look at Charles and his new toy!

I like the phrase because it accurately describes when people make a point out of voicing opinions specifically to get praise or come across as a good person. It is absolutely spot on and it doesn't matter how much you try to accuse me of being alt right.

And stop making stuff up. I never said I never believed in any kind of privilege. That is a blatant lie.

Originally Posted by Fluff (Post 2000768)

I like the phrase because it accurately describes when people make a point out of voicing opinions specifically to get praise or come across as a good person.