That sounds pretty legal.

It wasnt, you can pretty much take that at face value. It was just one line of rambling from a moron doing a terrible job at making a point. Dude talks about critical thinking and rambles off some of the most unnuanced ish ive ever heard.

It's meant to be taken at face value, but it's also being used to prove a larger point? Which point would that be?

I listened to it on my way to work. He was attempting to debunk the framework of the communist manifesto. I dont remember having anything to do with the point he was making at the time. If youre really that interested go listen to his opening arguments, id have to relisten myself to give you an answer.

I'll pass. I get enough psuedo-intellectualism just from hearing my own thoughts.

Yeah i typically avoid him but i wanted to hear the context to better understand Lucys post.

2020 is gonna be a peak meme year. Glorious.

https://i.imgflip.com/27ippc.jpg

Pretty sure this has already been posted here but whatever
https://i.redd.it/ro5pag8fxa911.jpg

Libya is about to go ham.

-OccultNewsNetwork

The problem with Peterson is that he dances around his points and often doesn't even make them completely unless you've put way more time and effort than most people are willing to piece together what he's talking about by watching multiple videos of him talking about similar things. My context may very well be 100% correct but I'll be damned if I slog through hours of his talks to find out.