Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor
(Post 2111842)
that's not really the point
it's just don't imagine proponents of direct democracy as asking for a giant poll
that would indeed be pretty unwieldy
|
maybe not in your case, but one form of direct democracy is voting directly on policy initiatives. It's this form that people would point towards in a country like Switzerland, for example. So I don't think it's really mutually exclusive with the idea of a nation state.
As for unweildy, it doesn't seem less workable than the kind of completely decentralized global order you are speaking of. If anything I'd say the opposite is true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OccultHawk
(Post 2111855)
We live a lifestyle that is unsustainable. That means if we continue like this billions will die. Then if you offer a suggestion people disregard it like it’s ridiculous as if our actually reality isn’t. You hear “That’ll never work!” Well guess what? This **** isn’t working.
Our current political systems cannot take us another century as a species so clinging on to the status quo is infinitely more naive than embracing radical change.
|
Even if the current system is unsustainable long term, that doesn' necessarily mean it can be replaced with just anything
I'm not even saying "that could never happen" I'm saying I don't see it personally. The moral imperative collapses for me when you aren't presenting a true option out. It's very similar to me to when libertarians say taxation is theft. And so what if it is? I believe that any form of advanced society is and has always been built on top of a foundation of coercive force. I'm happy to discuss other possibilities, I just won't accept them unquestioningly.
|