Neapolitan

I Sgt Pepper, - I don't own Come On Over by Shania Twain.

You are comparing an album that from the late 1990's to an album made in the late 60's. You can only say that Come On Over has more recorded unit sold not that more people in the world own it. How would you know how many people own it? How many Sgt Pepper albums were copied from one person to another in the USSR and Eastern Bloc because they couldn't buy it.

Come On Over was relased during a time when when more people in the world owned audio equipment than people who owned record players at the end of the 60's. And CD sales were probably more accurately tallied compared to vinyl sales and digital downloads. So they are some things to consider when comparing the two album figrures.

We are talking about an album that was create on a three track (that's how Sir George Martin discribed it) that outsold hundreds of thousands of albums that were recorded on digital equipment. An album that outsold all previous releases by any other artist before it. If you look at the list do you see any album recorded before 1967 that broke 20 million units sold? List of best-selling albums - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The album came near the end of The Beatles career, at that time when they released the album it wasn't supported by a tour Sgt Pepper sold that many just on the reputation of the band.

__________________

Janszoon

I think the point you're making here kind of undermines itself. If it's unfair to compare an album from the 90s to an album from the 60s, then how is it fair to compare an album from the 60s to what came before? Keep in mind that in 1967 the whole emphasis on LPs over singles was still a really new concept so Sgt. Pepper's didn't exactly have much of a legacy to compete with.

__________________
A Night in the Life of the Invisible Man

Time & Place

25 Albums You Should Hear Before the Moon Crashes into the Earth and We All Die

last.fm

Urban Hat€monger ?

The eastern bloc has been open over 20 years I don't think you can use that argument.

And I think you'll find that Sgt Pepper was in shops available for the past 45 odd years I don't really see how you can use owning more audio equipment in the 90s argument . If people want it it's there.

More people wanted Shania Twain.
No accounting for taste but that's how it is.

__________________

blastingas10

I think the greatest bands from the sixties and seventies are Better than the greatest bands from any other era. It's all a matter of taste.

NEWGUY562

I agree

Goofle

What if the great band from the 70's also performed in the 80's? Or are we just working in base ten's for convenience?

__________________

blastingas10

That's counts. I'm just talking about bands that started in the sixties or seventies. It's those bands that influenced that influenced the bands of later generations.

Neapolitan

So we should ignore the fact that the Sgt Pepper album was desired to be own, but had to be copied from one fan to the next and subsequently no information exist how many people owned a copied for the 20-some years that the Eastern Bloc been closed?

The bulk of sales happens when an album is released. How well Sgt Pepper sold was limited to the structure of market at that time with limit availabity for vinyl to be played on and other factors. 30 years later it is bigger market, more of a global market. Shania Twain had the ability to sell more because more people were able to play her CDs. The whole argument is like how do you convert a thousand pounds per annum circa 17th century England to be equivalent to today's Euro?

And your argument undermines itself too, because it was The Beatles that help make switch from 45's singles to LP albums possible especially with the Sgt Pepper album for the Rock/Pop market. Some musicologist believe The Beatles help created a new paradigm of AOR with Sgt Pepper but to you it gets nullified because there was nothing before it that could compete with it or compare to it.

I always thought albums were important to the Jazz and Classical community as well.

__________________

Janszoon

That's a fair argument, but I still don't buy the "the moved a lot of units" angle.

I think, especially in the 60s and earlier, there was much more of an emphasis on live performance in jazz and classical. There's certainly a long tradition of jazz musicians hating the recording process and feeling that it really put a damper on what they did best.

__________________
A Night in the Life of the Invisible Man

Time & Place

25 Albums You Should Hear Before the Moon Crashes into the Earth and We All Die

last.fm

joy_circumcision

Just a question - are the sales of Sgt Pepper including CD and vinyl reissues? Because if so, The Beatles got to tap into the same global market Shania Twain did PLUS have twenty-five years or so before that global market to get a nice head start, and she still out-sold them. But if it just includes like initial release or a certain like statute of limitations on what counts then I can buy your argument fine.

Also, just a joke: I think you'd want to convert a thousand pounds per annum circa 17th century into today's pound unless you were trying to travel from 17th century England to modern France or Germany

LP format was actually never that big a deal to those communities until it became the norm for music listening and they had to change with the times. I can't remember what article I read on it, but basically most of the classical community never caught on until CDs, but jazz surely had a nice little LP takeoff when LPs did become the standard music-buying format.

__________________
My Music Journal
My RYM (My Pride and Joy)